cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: Browserify JS is in
Date Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:33:47 GMT
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri Dec 12 2014 at 10:25:51 AM Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm not actually worried about my disk filling up. Dependencies must be
> > vetted for appropriate licenses, so now there's more overhead here. If we
> > need to make a change to the module system now we need to poor through
> docs
> > and make PRs instead of just editing our very small code-base.
> >
> >
> This mix of MIT and 3-Clause BSD looks compatible to me.  It's weaker than
> Apache, but not incompatible.  Do we really need to send this to legal?
> https://github.com/substack/node-browserify/blob/master/LICENSE
>
> There are people who can argue your other points better, but saying that
> the license is the overhead when you can find it in the repo?  I'm not sure
> how we would have gotten this far if we had to check with legal for every
> single dependency.
>

I meant that it depends on a bunch of other modules. Run license-checker on
browserify and you get: http://pastebin.com/XDMCTRRb

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message