Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 860F417CEF for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 00:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25082 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2014 00:15:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 25061 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2014 00:15:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 25049 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2014 00:15:42 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 00:15:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 00:15:01 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id i17so3459209qcy.0 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:14:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=dcQIRihD5VcA5abVNW9n8ryrIV36nvqZnB5nRKBMc90=; b=P1PSMasJlOgt46rBkhDBBimhbr/t2my+1cEGpQjstsiHQtt8Sa7/h1WNoMtTsUTWeP Y1eaabaPfuC1wdPUbbtXHL/xnmUD2SkJyJ1RFBALgShiJirtkdinULYUegUv8xjswRUm XlU72z/82CziaYnxz+wqV5Pn5D0MqkTNExj1IAY6/gJBBtlyhPsadOKWGS8mG2TuErsE YotvFEjasGHzp1kuYiV2Dt3Dw568nq+SQ4oSY0SOk2zdm1GTUUDXdWKHbRsfhUXXCo3B ViU1doewfVosSrPlzHwmO9+abBelquyy7/CUZIvx5KZcB2OfeE6+oi9SFFva2v7cIZKd vwdw== X-Received: by 10.224.88.134 with SMTP id a6mr22235558qam.28.1415405654082; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:14:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.19.115 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:13:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <61388DC7-014E-4932-933E-F8793C2BD304@gmail.com> From: Shazron Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:13:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cordova 64-bit support To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2bbba398dd105074dcf4f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2bbba398dd105074dcf4f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Like it or not, it is the future of Apple's ecosystem. A lot of people will differ on the wanting to keep iOS 6 support. But we've regularly only supported only the latest, plus the previous - and it's a resources issue. If you want to volunteer testing everything on iOS 6 devices for each release, please do contribute. We are all working with limited resources here. On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM, julio cesar sanchez wrote: > what's the point of swift plugins? > is there something that can't be done with objective-c and need swift? > I think iOS 6 support is more important that the swift plugins > > 2014-11-07 20:14 GMT+01:00 Shazron : > > > Yup. So the answer is: > > > > cordova-ios: > > 64 bit support since cordova-ios 3.4.1. Xcode 6 only support since > > cordova-ios 3.7.0. > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Marcel Kinard > wrote: > > > > > I suspect Vidiraj's question was driven by this: > > > https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=10202014a > > > --001a11c2bbba398dd105074dcf4f--