cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Independent platform release summary
Date Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:08:18 GMT
Alright, 4.0.

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

> 4.0 and let's move on. It's just a number, and is a minor point in the end.
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Should we consider jumping to 13? You know... just prefix a 1 onto the
> > existing number.
> >
> > ....
> >
> > 4.0 (or any other number) is great by me!
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) <
> > panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > > 4.0 is also good. Should we tag and start a vote for that ?
> > > Sorry for asking about vote again, but I want to ensure that the issues
> > > that Sergey fixed in the CLI/Lib are impacting some folks and I hope
> this
> > > release could help them fast.
> > >
> > > On 10/10/14, 10:17 AM, "Victor Sosa" <sosah.victor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >lol... I like that :P
> > > >
> > > >2014-10-10 12:09 GMT-05:00 Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > >> On Oct 10, 2014 10:05 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b@brian.io> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > OR we move to named releases externally.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Cordova MX === 4.0
> > > >>
> > > >> Cordova Mexico?
> > > >>
> > > >> > On Oct 10, 2014 10:03 AM, "Michal Mocny" <mmocny@chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > 4 was also discussed as fine, and in isolation would have been
> our
> > > >> choice
> > > >> > > for sure -- but we worried that with the impending "cordova-4.0"
> > > >> releases,
> > > >> > > it would confuse users and not mark a clear departure from
> cadver.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > The more I think about it though, the less important I think
> that
> > > >>worry
> > > >> > > is.  Maybe 4.0 is fine.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > (Apologies to Steve, who just wants to get this over with)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > As is 4.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > This is more of an outreach, marketing, blogging, tweeting,
> etc
> > > >> problem.
> > > >> > > > Versions are for issue tracking not marketing. (Tho semver and
> > our
> > > >> > > > respective $BIGCO's confuse that to their and our continued
> > > >>strife.)
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > (All IMO of course, happy to follow the wisdom of the crowd on
> > > >>this
> > > >> one.)
> > > >> > > > On Oct 10, 2014 9:29 AM, "Michal Mocny" <mmocny@chromium.org>
> > > >>wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > 5 is also fine.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> > > >>wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > I am against it. Its not going to achieve the goal of
> > > >>alleviating
> > > >> > > > > > confusion. People see the CLI as the version not the
> > > >>platforms.
> > > >> I'd
> > > >> > > > > rather
> > > >> > > > > > we went to 5 if anything.
> > > >> > > > > > On Oct 9, 2014 3:56 PM, "Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN
> > > >>TECH)" <
> > > >> > > > > > panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > I meant tag and start the vote for the next release :)
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > On 10/9/14, 3:01 PM, "Chuck Lantz" <
> clantz@microsoft.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >+1
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >-Chuck
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >> > > > > > > >From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabbage@gmail.com]
> > > >> > > > > > > >Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:55 PM
> > > >> > > > > > > >To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > > >Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >+1 to not voting ;) , it implies we will wait 72 hours
> > > >>before
> > > >> > > moving
> > > >> > > > > on.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >How about if anyone is completely against 10.0.0 they
> > > >>voice it
> > > >> > > here,
> > > >> > > > > in
> > > >> > > > > > > >the next couple hours, otherwise we move forward.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >@purplecabbage
> > > >> > > > > > > >risingj.com
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Steven Gill <
> > > >> > > stevengill97@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> I don't think a vote is necessary. I'd hate to see us
> > > >>resort
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > > > voting
> > > >> > > > > > > >> to solve problems. Voting should be a last resort if
> > > >> consensus
> > > >> > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > >> split. I don't see that in this scenario.
> > > >> > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> I propose we bumb the version up to 10.0.0.
> > > >> > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Parashuram Narasimhan
> > (MS
> > > >> OPEN
> > > >> > > > > TECH) <
> > > >> > > > > > > >> panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > Lets start with a vote for 10.0.0 ? And if someone
> > > >>feels
> > > >> > > > strongly
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > about calling it something the vote could be
> > cancelled
> > > >>!!
> > > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > On 10/9/14, 2:41 PM, "Chuck Lantz"
> > > >><clantz@microsoft.com>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Yeah agreed - Vladimir squashed the bug and what
> was
> > > >>at
> > > >> once
> > > >> > > > > point
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >to be called 3.7.0 has been mainly waiting on a
> > > >>version
> > > >> > > number.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Personally I am fine with 10.0.0 or 5.0.0 - Either
> > > >>send
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > message
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >that platform versions are divorced from the CLI
> > from
> > > >>a
> > > >> > > > > versioning
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >perspective (though behavior is still
> predictable).
> > > >>Leo
> > > >> - I
> > > >> > > > > think
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >at least out of the gate devs will likely focus on
> > the
> > > >> CLI
> > > >> > > > > version
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >as primary.  Basically today, the cadence version
> of
> > > >>the
> > > >> CLI
> > > >> > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >what people talk about.  Heck, Cordova
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >3.4.1 was 3.4.0 for all platforms but iOS.  The
> main
> > > >> message
> > > >> > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >that
> > > >> > > > > > > >> when
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >you platform add android, you may see an npm pull
> > for
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >cordova-android@4.3.2 and that is expected.  It's
> > > just
> > > >> > > > > formalizing
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >the message and allows independent platform
> rev'ing.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >-Chuck
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >-----Original Message-----
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengill97@gmail.com]
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 2:13 PM
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >I think vladimir fixed the bug. We just need to
> > > >>release
> > > >> now.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Only thing holding back the release now is
> consensus
> > > >>on
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > version
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >of the cli. It seemed like most people were
> leaning
> > > >> toward
> > > >> > > > > 10.0.0.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Should I move forward with that? I would just have
> > to
> > > >> branch
> > > >> > > +
> > > >> > > > > pin
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >deps
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Leo the documentation version dropdown box would
> be
> > > >>tied
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > cli
> > > >> > > > > > > >>version.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >It still makes sense to copy over platform
> > > >>documentation
> > > >> into
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >platform repos and maybe copy it into docs during
> > > >> generation
> > > >> > > > > time.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >As for plugin pinning, plugins have more to do
> with
> > > >> > > platforms.
> > > >> > > > I
> > > >> > > > > > > >> wouldn't
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >say they aren't tied to the cli at all. I
> understand
> > > >>your
> > > >> > > point
> > > >> > > > > > > >>though.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >So far, we haven't had any plugins that won't work
> > > >>with
> > > >> > > > previous
> > > >> > > > > > > >> versions
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >(As far as I know). We should really fix the
> engine
> > > >>stuff
> > > >> for
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >plugins so we can keep track of what platforms
> they
> > > >>work
> > > >> for.
> > > >> > > > I'd
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >like us to give warnings to users to update their
> > > >>plugins
> > > >> if
> > > >> > > > > newer
> > > >> > > > > > > >>versions are out.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >Cordova info should also dump what versions of
> > plugins
> > > >> you
> > > >> > > have
> > > >> > > > > > > >> installed
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >if it doesn't already. In combination with cordova
> > > >>--save
> > > >> &
> > > >> > > > > cordova
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >--restore, we should be able to recommend a
> workflow
> > > >>that
> > > >> is
> > > >> > > > > easily
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >reproducible on any machine.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Chuck Lantz <
> > > >> > > > > clantz@microsoft.com>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Okay - so - there's a pretty nasty CLI blocker
> bug
> > > >> right
> > > >> > > now.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Plugins with dependencies don't install (this
> > > >>affects
> > > >> all
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platforms).  In my opinion, we need to get a CLI
> > > >> release
> > > >> > > out
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> really soon.  Are we closed on this topic, or do
> > we
> > > >> need to
> > > >> > > > > look
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> at doing the old process to get this out the
> door
> > > >>while
> > > >> we
> > > >> > > > are
> > > >> > > > > > > >>still talking?
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> There are also a series of other bugs in the
> > > >>currently
> > > >> > > tagged
> > > >> > > > > > > >>"3.6.4"
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platforms for Android, Windows, and Windows
> Phone
> > 8.
> > > >> These
> > > >> > > > can
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> be handled independently, but the CLI bug can't.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7670
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> -Chuck
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> From: Treggiari, Leo
> > > >>[mailto:leo.treggiari@intel.com]
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> To: Michal Mocny
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Subject: RE: Independent platform release
> summary
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> I'll have to admit that this seems a bit weird.
> > > >>That
> > > >> is,
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> independent versions of the CLI and platforms,
> > with
> > > >>a
> > > >> > > > "Cordova
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> release" named "something" - e.g. a date?
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Imagine a user wants to know whether the new
> > > >>whitelist
> > > >> > > entry
> > > >> > > > in
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> config.xml is supported in the versions of CLI
> and
> > > >> > > platforms
> > > >> > > > > that
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> they have - assuming they understand the
> > distinction
> > > >> > > between
> > > >> > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> CLI and platforms to begin with.  They use some
> > > >>command
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > > list
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> the versions of the "things" (CLI and
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platforms) they have installed.  They go to the
> > > >> individual
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> documentation of the "things" and try to figure
> it
> > > >>out.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> The way the Cordova documentation works today is
> > > >>nice
> > > >> with
> > > >> > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> combo box where I can select a Cordova version -
> > > >>3.6.0,
> > > >> > > > 3.5.0,
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> ...  What would the combo box contain in the new
> > > >> versioning
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> scheme and how many entries would there be?  Are
> > the
> > > >> > > answers
> > > >> > > > > > > >>"dates" and "lots of dates"?
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Or would there be no Cordova version
> documentation
> > > >> other
> > > >> > > than
> > > >> > > > > an
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> explanation of how to get the list of "things"
> you
> > > >> > > currently
> > > >> > > > > have
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> and where to find the documentation on them.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> To "pin" or not to "pin.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Note that, to me, the pinning choice defines
> what
> > > >> happens
> > > >> > > > when
> > > >> > > > > I
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>use  "cordova {plugin | platform} add foo" with
> no
> > > >> specific
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>version specified.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> I've understood, so far at least, that plugins
> are
> > > >>not
> > > >> > > pinned
> > > >> > > > > (an
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> add always fetches something) and platforms are
> > > >>pinned
> > > >> to a
> > > >> > > > CLI
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> version (an add tells the CLI that I will be
> using
> > > >>that
> > > >> > > > > platform
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> (already
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> installed) for this project).  Everything I have
> > > >>read
> > > >> which
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> includes 1 book and the on-line project
> > > >>documentation,
> > > >> > > > suggest
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> that, even if not stating it explicitly.  E.g.
> > > >>plugins
> > > >> talk
> > > >> > > > > about
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> "fetching" and platforms don't.  There is a way
> to
> > > >> fetch a
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> specific version of platform support.  That's
> good
> > > >>and
> > > >> if I
> > > >> > > > do
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> that it is up to me to understand the
> > compatibility
> > > >>of
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > > > >>specific version I requested.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Is this true?  If so then the npm cordova
> behavior
> > > >> seems
> > > >> > > > weird.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> That is, if I "npm install cordova" I get a set
> of
> > > >> pinned
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platforms.  If I "npm update cordova", I get a
> new
> > > >>CLI
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> nothing else - i.e. not the platforms that were
> > > >>pinned
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > > that
> > > >> > > > > > > >>version of the CLI?
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Should the plugin and platform 'pin' behavior be
> > the
> > > >> same?
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Should both be pinned?  Some may find this
> > > >>alternative
> > > >> > > > > > > >>"blasphemous"
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> but the core plugin versions tested with a
> version
> > > >>of
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > CLI
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> could be pinned to the version of the CLI.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Should both not be pinned?  It would be more
> > > >>consistent
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > > if
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> users are OK with plugins being unpinned, why
> not
> > > >> > > platforms?
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> But maybe plugins and platforms are different.
> > > >>Plugins
> > > >> are
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> purely run-time code.  Platforms are primarily
> > > >>tooling
> > > >> with
> > > >> > > > > some
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> run-time
> > > >> > > > > > > >> code.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Does that difference make the current pinning
> > > >>behavior
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > best
> > > >> > > > > > > >> choice.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Maybe, but personally I would prefer both to be
> > > >>pinned
> > > >> -
> > > >> > > > i.e. I
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> install a version of Cordova, and until I update
> > it,
> > > >> every
> > > >> > > > > time I
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> add a platform or 'core' plugin, I get the same
> > > >>thing.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Leo
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> From: mmocny@google.com [mailto:
> mmocny@google.com
> > ]
> > > >>On
> > > >> > > Behalf
> > > >> > > > > Of
> > > >> > > > > > > >> Michal
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Mocny
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:47 PM
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> To: Treggiari, Leo
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard; dev
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Subject: Re: Independent platform release
> summary
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> With this direction, there is no single number.
> > > >>Users
> > > >> > > should
> > > >> > > > > not
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> functionally care about CLI version, so there
> will
> > > >>just
> > > >> be
> > > >> > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platform versions that matter, really.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Downstreams can of course put labels on
> > > >>combinations of
> > > >> > > > > versions,
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> so "PhoneGap 4" may be Android 4, iOS 3.8, and
> > etc.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Treggiari, Leo
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> <leo.treggiari@intel.com <mailto:
> > > >> leo.treggiari@intel.com
> > > >> >>
> > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Did I miss anything?
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> I don't think we closed on this (I had to leave
> > the
> > > >> > > meeting a
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> little
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> early) but a remaining question is how to
> version
> > > >>what
> > > >> we
> > > >> > > > (and
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> users) call "Cordova".  Assuming a "Cordova"
> > > >>version is
> > > >> a
> > > >> > > > point
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> in time collection of the latest CLI version +
> > > >>platform
> > > >> > > > > versions
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> + plugin versions.  Is the Cordova version
> semver
> > > >> (using
> > > >> > > what
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> algorithm with respect to its contained
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> components) or is that what you meant by
> ""latest
> > > >>as
> > > >> of
> > > >> > > Oct
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> 2014" or something".
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Thanks,
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Leo
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> From: mmocny@google.com<mailto:
> mmocny@google.com>
> > > >> [mailto:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> mmocny@google.com<mailto:mmocny@google.com>] On
> > > >>Behalf
> > > >> Of
> > > >> > > > > Michal
> > > >> > > > > > > >> Mocny
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:13 PM
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> To: Michal Mocny
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Subject: Re: Independent platform release
> summary
> > > >> Thanks
> > > >> > > > > everyone
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> for participation in what was a long and
> grueling
> > > >> > > discussion.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Summary of current proposal:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Cad-ver is dead.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Everything moves Sem-ver, with platforms
> > > >>continuing
> > > >> from
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> current versions and diverging over time.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - CLI potentially gets a significant version
> bump
> > to
> > > >> > > showcase
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> this reset (to 5.0 or 10.0, not yet settled)
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Pinning default platform versions *will*
> > continue
> > > >>for
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > time
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> being, but it will be trivial to override the
> > > >>default.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Platforms will have CLI <engine> tag
> equivalent
> > > >> (unclear
> > > >> > > > yet
> > > >> > > > > if
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> as node peerDependency or otherwise) so devs
> will
> > > >>know
> > > >> when
> > > >> > > > > they
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> need to upgrade/downgrade CLI for non-default
> > > >>platform
> > > >> > > > > versions.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - After a platform update, eventually CLI will
> > > >>release
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > > "pin"
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> the new default, and bump its PATCH/MINOR
> version
> > > >> (unless
> > > >> > > CLI
> > > >> > > > > had
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> a functional update at same time that requires a
> > > >>larger
> > > >> > > > bump).
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - After you update CLI, your existing projects
> > don't
> > > >> > > change &
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> platform upgrades remain explicit, but you will
> > now
> > > >>get
> > > >> > > > > warnings
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> if your installed platforms are older than the
> CLI
> > > >> pinned
> > > >> > > > > > versions.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Event MAJOR changes to platforms are not MAJOR
> > > >> updates to
> > > >> > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> CLI, unless there is an actual breaking change
> to
> > > >>the
> > > >> CLI
> > > >> > > > tool
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> (i.e. new CLI will no longer work with the
> > currently
> > > >> > > > installed
> > > >> > > > > > > >>platform).
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - Platform and CLI docs have to split out and be
> > > >> released &
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> versioned alongside each (like plugins).  Cross
> > > >> references
> > > >> > > > from
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> one to the other will only be needed in a few
> > > >>places.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Note: The CLI-Platform compatibility story is
> > > >> functionally
> > > >> > > no
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>different than we have today.  If you upgrade
> your
> > > >>CLI
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > > there
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>is a  breaking change, you will have to re-create
> > > >>your
> > > >> > > > projects
> > > >> > > > > or
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>downgrade CLI again.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Now we plan to be more explicit about it and
> offer
> > > >> > > warnings.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Note: There is no concept of a "fancy-pants"
> > release
> > > >> other
> > > >> > > > than
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> to say "latest as of Oct 2014" or something.
> > > >>Platforms
> > > >> > > don't
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> have a single common set of functionality, so
> > CadVer
> > > >> was
> > > >> > > > > somewhat
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> misleading already in that sense.  We could
> > > >>introduce a
> > > >> > > > concept
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> of "API Level" for exec bridge or something for
> > use
> > > >>by
> > > >> > > > plugins,
> > > >> > > > > > > >>but not sure that has value.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> What wasn't covered that came to mind after the
> > > >>fact:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> - When there is an update available for CLI,
> > should
> > > >>we
> > > >> > > give a
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> warning to update? (this is useful, but isn't
> > common
> > > >> for
> > > >> > > npm
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> modules.  I think we already do this from
> plugman
> > > >>when
> > > >> you
> > > >> > > > try
> > > >> > > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > >>publish plugins?).
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> Did I miss anything?
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> -Michal
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Michal Mocny
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >><mmocny@chromium.org<mailto:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> mmocny@chromium.org>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > External Public link for those that just want
> to
> > > >> > > > watch/chat:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > > https://plus.google.com/events/cm4l0vifcig920qkhpn5stqiet4
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > Hangout link to join the conversation:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >>
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/hoaevent/AP36tYcNwXEyet4Xv_23HiTl
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > 4I
> K0jsM4NlmGy5kbLsPIW3SnOsUEIQ?authuser=0&hl=en
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > See you in 30 minutes.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Michal Mocny
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > <mmocny@chromium.org
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> <mailto:mmocny@chromium.org>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> +dev list again
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> Not everyone could make 1pm, not everyone
> could
> > > >>make
> > > >> > > 2pm.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> While I don't think we need a full 2 hours,
> I'm
> > > >> hoping
> > > >> > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> start late and end early -- proving
> opportunity
> > > >> people
> > > >> > > to
> > > >> > > > > pop
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> in at either time and chime
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> in.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Marcel
> Kinard
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> <cmarcelk@gmail.com<mailto:
> cmarcelk@gmail.com
> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> Is the expected duration 1 hour or 2 hours?
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Michal Mocny
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >><mmocny@chromium.org<mailto:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> mmocny@chromium.org>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > So it looks like Today 1-3 EST or Friday
> 1-3
> > > >>EST
> > > >> are
> > > >> > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > best
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>times.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> I'm
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > going to start the ball rolling to do this
> > > >>TODAY,
> > > >> but
> > > >> > > > if
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > that proves
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> too
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > short notices we'll move it to Friday.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > I'll email out links to hangout at 12:30
> or
> > > >>so,
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > I'm
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > hoping Steven
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> can
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > make it before 2pm since he's been most
> > active
> > > >> with
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > releases
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> recently.
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > -Michal
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >-- To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > >> > > dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > >> dev-help@cordova.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > >> dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > >> dev-help@cordova.apache.org
> > > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>?B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKC
> > > >>>B�
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> >>>?�?[��X��ܚX�K??K[XZ[?�??]�][��X��ܚX�P?�ܙ?ݘK�\?X�?K�ܙ�B��܈?Y??]?[ۘ[??��[X
> > > >>>[�
> > > >> > > > > > > >?�??K[XZ[?�??]�Z?[???�ܙ?ݘK�\?X�?K�ܙ�B
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Victor Adrian Sosa Herrera
> > > >IBM Software Engineer
> > > >Guadalajara, Jalisco
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cordova.apache.org
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message