Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CFFC17AF0 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36496 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2014 18:04:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 36436 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2014 18:04:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 36102 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2014 18:04:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:04:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AC_DIV_BONANZA,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stevengill97@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.46] (HELO mail-qg0-f46.google.com) (209.85.192.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:04:09 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a108so611092qge.5 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:04:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=BzSImKxFuHveXUo6GiNXqlSpsA/mQu7VKGmZGb0IXfA=; b=iPuQNDOjfD7jmyJ+wO7P8KPmS4mfz+NgqZSysfZC9wl9BjSB2XBX0tjI7jGWOQEGWx RjBQjudU1G2i2qmeW2mVhXdNmoVXY1lrscvSXoO1J0FtrBabLgW88nODrNNmAvYvAPTh c4J9lK9EHfVdHT3PufoswzWw4liY/VwidfgxNQDZXo7ygGahdnwMTJKCV9dm1zSAqVTD YatNIB2cYNFOihQRUP9eHjKtWY+dOYT2GkC8vnKbCOyhCBiry5LyUZ+R5jDoEiZ4gQYG /X+i1PdLlecjiNLkjKMB3MpXKnpAgMhyOKtoU3l5ZTUoToqHbB34ZqvSlGIvQyQcn3Ar 1IjA== X-Received: by 10.140.91.46 with SMTP id y43mr52021713qgd.58.1412013847126; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:04:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.101.179 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:03:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <88b5c52b1ac94d30a32c5b7976f33e8f@BL2PR03MB417.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <161cdb5035f147659c3fda00254be796@DM2PR03MB366.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <21b9688016f4421fb1093d693aedebd4@BL2PR03MB417.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <16a9d783da65481ea77444d66921da5f@BL2PR03MB417.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <281FAA7D-960A-4802-859A-E36E903EA68A@gmail.com> <88b5c52b1ac94d30a32c5b7976f33e8f@BL2PR03MB417.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> From: Steven Gill Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:03:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Next Cordova Release To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113aa822c6acf10504381735 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a113aa822c6acf10504381735 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alright lets do this! Releasing: Cordova-Android 3.6.4 Cordova-Windows 3.6.4 Cordova-WP8 3.6.4 Cordova-Browser 3.6.0 Cordova-Lib 0.21.14 Cordova-JS 3.7.0 Cordova-Plugman 0.22.11 Cordova-CLI 3.7.0 I think it is a good time to drop the cadVer-SemVer versioning for the CLI. Lets just make it SemVer but start from 3.7.0 1) Release issue: - coho create-release-bug is supposed to be used for cadence releases. It won't make sense when we aren't release every platform. We will have to create the release issue manually. This is what we have been doing for tools releases for a while now. 2) Platform version files should be bumped using coho. Coho also goes in and changes the version script output for many of the platforms (all except windows ones last I saw) 3) I like this idea. I personally think we should test it thoroughly before we push it live though. Not sure what problems might arise. If people feel confident with releasing this change and have tested it, I won't stand in the way of it being released. I recently merged in my Indy platform release work. I want to take this release to go through the process and fix any problems that come up. You can see the doc at https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/platforms-release-p= rocess.md. Sergey, I can work with you on this or, if you don't mind, I can take over from here. -Steve On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) < v-segreb@microsoft.com> wrote: > Hi, here are release branches: > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/tree/rb_3.6.4-0.21.14 > https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/tree/rb_0.21.14 > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/tree/3.6.x > https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/tree/3.6.x > https://github.com/apache/cordova-wp8/tree/3.6.x > > I've not updated versions and added tags due to the following > questions/issues: > > 1. I wanted to create release issue to use while updating version files > but it is not possible since we don't have 3.6.4 version in JIRA. Could > someone create it? > =CE=BB coho create-release-bug --version=3D3.6.4 > Cannot find version ID number in JIRA related to "root" version string= : > 3.6.4 > > 2. Is it ok to bump platform version files manually? - I see we mixed coh= o > and manual edits during 3.6.3 release. > > 3. What do you think if we change depending platform versions in > platforms.js [1] to 3.6 (or 3.6.x) instead of 3.6.3/4? This way we will = be > able to release 3.6.4 for ios, bb, other platforms w/o TOOLS release. Sam= e > if we want to release 3.6.5 version of some platform later. > * npm cache logic used in LIB seems to correctly handle this case > and download updated platform version when it is available on npm > * for --usegit option we can have 3.6 tag along with 3.6.3 and > 3.6.4 so this will work as well > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/blob/master/cordova-lib/src/cordova= /platforms.js > > Thx! > Sergey > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabbage@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 2:20 AM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: Next Cordova Release > > Yes, 3.6.x branch and tag it when it is ready. > then they can also be cherry-picked into master, or you could commit them > into master, and cherry-pick them into the 3.6.x branch ... > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Marcel Kinard wrote= : > > > I'd suggest pushing the commits on to the end of the 3.6.x branch, and > > then tag it 3.6.4. > > > > On Sep 26, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) < > > v-segreb@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, I=E2=80=99ve created the following repos for 3.6.4 release and go= ing to > > > push > > them to apache. Should I use 3.6.x branch and create a new 3.6.4 tag > > or > > 3.6.4 branch? > > > > > --001a113aa822c6acf10504381735--