Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADFFC11306 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73360 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2014 16:35:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 73317 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2014 16:35:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 73304 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2014 16:35:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:35:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of iclelland@google.com designates 209.85.218.46 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.46] (HELO mail-oi0-f46.google.com) (209.85.218.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:35:15 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id i138so3907586oig.5 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:35:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=+YOqQZ2Oqkat28LXvVTRrmN/bcWzv3cGYr0w+76ncb8=; b=Fnaf+HdnRSjKt7YcMTnlDc0DMzqWhY5OFYrwzUXZTIxkueqX7eMQyrpqwhcNDbZ6iB 1g2UTHnmzMmPaDPOVNNp2+5k3atGf/4WMIr+RqTvO9NGYLt7yhtGk9qFX+TimLYLuILn U72jU9YhGAv0/XGItxUgomuLPJ+PpOMRbGesbbtUasfxOSnlDJiWNU757Uh8QPJQ0RX3 y1VHWcpq572qhnWhca9sOTuEEhYeAC2erTl0X0RmUqoPYTtIKWS7zJi1Bi5CSe3uO5U9 vuVzlIh5iuiMdz2Un4GlRNyyxswa5TpUDftM4lrIM8k4NZ+UFhVCdilf4si1f+wwXIp9 GfhQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=+YOqQZ2Oqkat28LXvVTRrmN/bcWzv3cGYr0w+76ncb8=; b=IGz79VEk0SUzQYx9Gk0uVbgFLf/eSK1VwW/B4hza20qV6aX1Op6MkgCBJGJbRsbjer Wl/lF1OG9+w2dX1ZieNS1v818sWuB4sgQYPnIxY+knUMT4FIbbpx8/npZdMNVS/+EoXh RrRgZ0TnBKOfLOulkyEyrySETP/GqE17LILgg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+YOqQZ2Oqkat28LXvVTRrmN/bcWzv3cGYr0w+76ncb8=; b=HBAK4WaxhaQ0/HZVjoFpb3vkhIti+fgWRrL8fzvA7Kv2Ul/OzKC9s4Pe5EpN1mPETB Y8kXbz94WayYVpfooVK97Fp8TFOKLplrVYXcXG0e76TGqT8YzUbUECo6Ci03zEzembIA AlRejrAt1yrtaogGAp4pdnY4aDQDjDw8X6vFhVjBbhf79JxPCjF+XIXmGMn1qw5sBZo8 GdCanL0x8rLsC2gxmsvarzb4YN1lR6qTmeeqO0mK4qoru4Jj4kHN2/sdCnw6pNSkfbO8 Rwr3ZN0FIysy9ebzdWG2viwnqTtOm1vpm79yYHv116f6zPgtBrbNfp2t03pnL+hxVL7g tNrw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlXwuv96Z0Yzj5OevIBY6uq/4MB3RJXannb5oTFPkHyMR518CF0bVpkRlER4GE9cuO/g9vX X-Received: by 10.60.174.197 with SMTP id bu5mr20728744oec.3.1411403714046; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:35:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: iclelland@google.com Received: by 10.182.210.201 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:34:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ian Clelland Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:34:53 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WmKThgumoLe4kRv-Y1PiY66l0PM Message-ID: Subject: Re: new NPM 2.x To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6c6e002c8610503aa0972 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bd6c6e002c8610503aa0972 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It shouldn't matter for users, but I have seen several issues in the past where using the wrong version of npm means that you can't publish modules or plugins. It's something to be aware of, at least. On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Ray Camden wrote: > Being lazy, but can you explain why it matters? Ie, is there a reason > *not* to just upgrade? I assume most folks would think, =C2=B3new version= of > npm, just update and don=C2=B9t worry about it=C2=B2 - but does it impact= using > Cordova? > > > On 9/22/14, 11:09 AM, "Carlos Santana" wrote: > > >NPM 2.x was released last week. > > > >latest nodejs stable 0.10.32 comes with npm@1.4.28 > > > >if you do $ npm install -g npm (you will get npm@2.0.0) > > > >More about npm 2.x and semver: > >http://blog.npmjs.org/post/98131109725/npm-2-0-0 > > > >cordova and phonegap get's mentioned in the blog post. > > > >For now just pay close attention which npm you are using 1.x or 2.x with= $ > >npm -v > > > >-- > >Carlos Santana > > > > --047d7bd6c6e002c8610503aa0972--