Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 393D6114D3 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81681 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2014 18:35:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 81640 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2014 18:35:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 81624 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2014 18:35:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:35:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.223.169] (HELO mail-ie0-f169.google.com) (209.85.223.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:35:17 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id rl12so8752204iec.14 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:35:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NVwnruEi3AvKxh2hXgLjmtkllzRwCOZxMtC86iI5Lvw=; b=X59VU8d5teAL7CRTUwSrahoJIDLaED6O6aQEcIujwMQ4DM1UMym5pgl1SFPHgRzUOd 5kRRslTebr4nJ3cQJdsuDCmVGYRHmU2o6gLobq4gC6S7Pkfu1i0ccZzJCxJ+i9X9GXtj LikmjpKeFyhVERQz1mej0W0djOFlcwKC+LZRjVKjbScTMHnmD+/dYo29xxaRZOdIOvsY o+zQIKSWvfjIlZ60yMv1KKLIEXcDLP5KLdDHeIg3WLta/CR40Dn5zOsk4MyKd3qmOQPy 4LeEpkXEdZo0KI0V9dal2WXTFIlWfMRrVojPtxt5ydi2HLtZhuhaExcWQ0PgxqSpxsj5 CWcw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+tfcHPYammwhVhxfDNuwaMxx2MKyctkzNf1/WsZ+wOnRPYta59SrqZ9sTx3hdr6FA7TuY MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.96.8 with SMTP id ce8mr4271257icc.14.1410460515877; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.153.211 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:35:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4e9a8e743a7845a59e9d93645b5c40ab@BL2PR03MB417.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <540e65e3.4829460a.50f4.ffffe9f9@mx.google.com> <78733933094445ea8bfa636aa2d95b08@BL2PR03MB417.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <3151F2AF-1D71-4B5B-AF5C-EC7294C5ACDD@gmail.com> <00A3002B-31BA-4543-A809-A14CD11745E8@gmail.com> <4e9a8e743a7845a59e9d93645b5c40ab@BL2PR03MB417.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:35:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Plugins Release From: Bryan Higgins To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec518674204ec4e0502ce6e9b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec518674204ec4e0502ce6e9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The latest test runner does not work properly on BB10. The tests continue infinitely (thousands of specs so far) and the output slowly transitions from green to red. I'll revert to an older version to test this release. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) < v-segreb@microsoft.com> wrote: > Could someone also review/merge the following PRs. Thanks in advance! > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-contacts/pull/43 > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-contacts/pull/44 > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-media/pull/26 > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-media-capture/pull/25 > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-media-capture/pull/26 > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-inappbrowser/pull/53 > > -Sergey > -----Original Message----- > From: iclelland@google.com [mailto:iclelland@google.com] On Behalf Of Ian > Clelland > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 9:35 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Plugins Release > > I've seen the same thing with the new test runner.. it appears that the > framework itself is rather fragile, and certain things, like calling done() > twice within a test, will cause the whole test runner to go wonky. > > The file tests did this a couple of weeks ago, and I resolved it with > CB-7431; I was running into it again this morning with the Contacts tests > on Android, but the CB-7532 fix seems to have helped that. > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Archana Naik > wrote: > > > I am not sure if they are blockers. Mostly not. I am seeing about 12 > > failures. spec 83, 84, 100,104,105,106108,110,113,114116,125,126127,128. > > I am also seeing weird thing about mobilespec reporting the failures. > > It reports each failure twice and runs the whole autotests twice. On > > top window i see "finished in 50.0003s" "finished in 14.209s" twice. > > Ofcourse second run reports almost double the failures coz it adds > > from previous run. > > > > As far as plugin release goes, i think we will need sometime in > > debugging these failures as well as mobilespec reporting bugs. I > > suppose we can go ahead with release and I will fix in parallel in > > master branch of file plugin. > > sounds good? > > > > Archana > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Martin Gonzalez < > > martin.c.glez.glez@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Archana, which specs or what kind of failures are you getting > > > over amazon-fireOs? is there any Jira Item related to that? > > > > > > 2014-09-11 12:02 GMT-05:00 Marcel Kinard : > > > > > > > Archana, do you think these are a blocker? If so, what would be > > > > your > > time > > > > estimate to get them fixed? > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Archana Naik > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > With latest tests in plugins, I am seeing many failures on > > > amazon-fireos > > > > > esp in file tests. I would like to fix those if possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Martin Gonzalez > > > > > > --bcaec518674204ec4e0502ce6e9b--