Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-38037-apmail-cordova-dev-archive=cordova.apache.org@cordova.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2466411779
	for <apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:36:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 43637 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2014 19:36:38 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43599 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2014 19:36:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cordova.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cordova.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cordova.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43587 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2014 19:36:38 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:36:38 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qa0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:36:12 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v10so4000771qac.35
        for <dev@cordova.apache.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=MwbfkguD2ntFQ3on9ZTtQgIrS0lR6rF64wg753r6DZk=;
        b=GNXCEBMQKh31PfUqKIdmUqETBk2b0RnbTl9AppOvp9vlkAOsIBvmDGkLx0wUlu2QFJ
         aICUlRq4qhNqkbHOGlwMEErZ2n3RRTgasaBZCB4rnI6Niq5ksw0lXhhR+2GxIEPTUgBz
         nQSgl+ns+KQHGNx6xDb+nlPVZckiS7z2vUtu6FvqDzD5pnx8BlZClTkQYwCCd6xw4GRx
         Dkqms/OSygjapkfUIPAcf5EHcp1inUSW2wKaWmKPigpqlUrYmlGXixE1IGOh3mWl2O3Q
         mV/tlWEA0RJWO0+dtDN5tTnC9qVmGxpaS5W8g84IPMUgulV8StcNGlGZdYViHZsCruFz
         4wwA==
X-Received: by 10.140.104.213 with SMTP id a79mr5017081qgf.46.1410464170532;
 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.51.209 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAK_TSX+D=oq0YMJKP115Ny6McZ=vHXTCGu42QgZ9ewo+g4iyQA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <EC3F042D23B4FD42AF6669EDA631C78E01B8A745@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CABiQX1WkWL9yRfsnHXwYWmACDa4AYqh-TW_wC00E3BY6PGVEuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK_TSX+D=oq0YMJKP115Ny6McZ=vHXTCGu42QgZ9ewo+g4iyQA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:35:30 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAE6O_-bU3rYrUU2gex6FpYnnm8Kg-JA8Mbaev_vG6mJ5FyBSOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is there any plan to make InAppBrowser plugin based on
 CordovaWebView
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113532e2da6b010502cf470d
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001a113532e2da6b010502cf470d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'm thinking of the preference route for IAP, for iOS - once we get the
WKWebView support going, having a separate plugin for that seems too much
trouble (and duplicating code).
Maybe a pref like
<preference name="WebEngine" value="default" /> where value can be
WKWebView, Crosswalk etc


On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Ian Clelland <iclelland@chromium.org>
wrote:

> I think it sounds like it should be a new plugin, that you would install
> instead of IAP, and that depends on Crosswalk, rather than forcing the
> existing IAP plugin to require a separate webview.
>
> Or perhaps IAP should have a preference which determines which WebView it
> should instantiate, much like Cordova itself does, as of 4.0.x
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Makes sense that we should do this.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Gao, Chun <chun.gao@intel.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found there are some requirements for InAppBrowser plugin to support
> > HTML5 features
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25613773/is-it-possible-to-force-cordova-inappbrowser-to-use-crosswalk-webview
> > . As InAppBrowser plugin is implemented based on android WebView
> component,
> > lots of HTML5 features were not supported on Android before Kitkat. Is
> > there any plan to implement the plugin with CordovaWebView? If the plugin
> > could be implemented based on CordovaWebView, third party web runtime,
> like
> > Crosswalk , could provide the HTML5 capabilities to InAppBrowser.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Gao Chun
> >
>

--001a113532e2da6b010502cf470d--