cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 3.6 cordova plugin versions
Date Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:59:33 GMT
Thanks Ray! That would be great.
I concur with what Michal said. Unfortunately, testing with older releases
hasn't been our focus (resources and whatnot).

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:

> I'm not an expert on <engine> requirements, but I'm happy to review your
> post.
>
> -Michal
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Ray Camden <raycamde@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Ah, good point there.
> >
> > I¹m going to write up a blog post on this after I run some errands. I¹d
> > love a quick review from you, or anyone, before I publish. I¹m also going
> > to add something to the core docs.
> >
> >
> > On 9/30/14, 11:18 AM, "Michal Mocny" <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > >That sounds reasonable.
> > >
> > >The <engine> tag is a bit weird though, in that the dependency is on cli
> > >and not platform version.  Combined with CLI semver and platform release
> > >unbundling, its a bit hard to reason about.  It kinda still works
> because
> > >we have default platform versions pinned to cli versions, but users can
> > >explicitly install non-default platform versions if they chose, and
> > >plugins
> > >may have support for only a subset of platforms..
> > >
> > >-Michal
> > >
> > >On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Ray Camden <raycamde@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ah - never mind. I picked a plugin that didn¹t have it specified. I
> > >>picked
> > >> another random one and it *was* shown.
> > >>
> > >> I¹d say that for plugins w/o engine support, the site should still say
> > >> something, even if
> > >>
> > >> Engine Number
> > >> Not Specified
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message