Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3911B11CB4 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80720 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2014 14:56:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 80687 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2014 14:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 80674 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2014 14:56:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:56:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of iclelland@google.com designates 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.173] (HELO mail-ob0-f173.google.com) (209.85.214.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:56:05 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id vb8so248685obc.32 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 07:55:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=SoZQhnFt73tD8c68B7CxOVZnm1pzLBkjk7zo8dsIHGE=; b=EdRqmUX9TxCmxTXWTmGo1aq9n1wlk1idOys+oLTq5dvQE6NWfzrMZ2uAJ406psUxjG f+Kqg5bXKbQD0JV6PZnrfJ9jHvribNrPODJrHEcyUAm6xge7ibOXZrmA0G48NKNTnN5w 9ulRaH1cqhgoYwTX935gr7RylVvQFtNM4mnDQz9b7yPRQWbOEbhmSSBE7yLFHZ8hzrHs bDIOGVAfqOc9Tay6Aop78wHFADOQwoWAq/RshObQThOc/r3pMLttdrsYJT8cX73/J4ah Ul1c3gyU9RydZNRP5bX3/w7QTzRepUNRg9S7vRfStVcsv7YvQCe2tnBKRnYq8/h2AUWm Z32A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=SoZQhnFt73tD8c68B7CxOVZnm1pzLBkjk7zo8dsIHGE=; b=lnspyMvauqSgP13ro/UbIW/mj0Aza8x3bWL8SMLxp5hgfnw7O89pbEWtgtW1kWCKWK tNikr1T+OrI5Hw9Dr/f3IzK7VsUUbS9kbMqEMr51KVvYnZ8Vmz2i+1jL0zYALeG69yvh PctJYo/T5VjEGaZx78Ac0L5LeJ0MYk1ci6zR0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to:content-type; bh=SoZQhnFt73tD8c68B7CxOVZnm1pzLBkjk7zo8dsIHGE=; b=CNx90CpfJZ/tUaFdnVWZk8bTjVB4RVwZ3tFwwhVrvgjvuRsPRozxvot3DvRB2oAZZY 1YOmCkFyivH8Rq8PlIa/t7cdtMmgcFGEJeokCWY98/r049F1jgLf5kFHk6ubNiuZ3/WZ SZJ+tDCz9DItz9HldpaPmgyK393G8/Ewb1u5C1Fr6oFlF64JoD8b7KBG4eeDB3chBoR1 6PepYki1o4KFbTjOH5eO6N09SJvb7vyBJrkHE24erfmIw4wppxlH0jN0GcNePddWorc6 wfhPggAMpa/eXOdAmBum7Sb8s0gSTD+5g7f66WXginnW01kzOdDfrM3EagMpnXh7YXl4 uo9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnH2x19Aro7UoXGzE4E7gzIi9xgj5Eun2a4Dj/CCCMQjmpRB61Ic3rB0AXs5VD5sivq6qzn X-Received: by 10.182.236.65 with SMTP id us1mr34692694obc.38.1409151344133; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 07:55:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: iclelland@google.com Received: by 10.182.111.8 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 07:55:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Clelland Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:55:24 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fGl2-XgZAvKErA6qaYCDK_tsIgU Message-ID: Subject: File test failures (was: Re: [Testing] No content to speak of) To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2f9ac4d620805019d9d39 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2f9ac4d620805019d9d39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Martin, can you post the spec test output somewhere? (Or anyone who can replicate this on a windows phone device -- I don't have a test environment set up for that yet, but I'm slowly working at it) I've checked the code again from my side, and I can't see where or how it's failing, so the mobile-spec output would be pretty helpful at this point. Thanks, Ian On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Martin Gonzalez < martin.c.glez.glez@gmail.com> wrote: > Agree, over android it looks good, however running the tests over Windows > Phone, the final count is 13 new fails. > Specs failing: 9, 9.5, 10, 11, 15, 24, 82, 110, 116, 121, 122, 123, 124. > > > > 2014-08-26 11:20 GMT-05:00 Marcel Kinard : > > > Thanks, Ian! On Android 4.4, I'm now getting no failures with the all the > > automatic tests (new-style plugin tests and old-style non-plugin tests). > > > > Now to start poking at the manual tests... > > > > On Aug 26, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Ian Clelland > wrote: > > > > > The other issue should be resolved now, but if someone with a WP8 > device > > > can test it out as well, it'd be appreciated. > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Martin Gonzalez > --001a11c2f9ac4d620805019d9d39--