Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BA01B97E-AF16-4EBD-BD7E-DB7DDBB8D423@redhat.com>
References: 
 <CAOBL_k5qZppyLCbgZcARbqyObJmB1hhyG6GyxL2AV8esWQcZSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<538BDF66.5080608@tmbsw.com>
	<C5A052EE-B738-44D1-A19C-76BE93ACEA18@redhat.com>
	<CANpVHHx62boyS3yPp6xTb+VeU13N4oYHT9oFXoc7VQ6R3LLmJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BA01B97E-AF16-4EBD-BD7E-DB7DDBB8D423@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 10:30:26 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOBL_k6PmHA_5eFPUEFYHSQZFsJ54C9tKNoa=LFcZqSv03RxCA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Android Plugin API
From: Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b673cc20b678a04fdee4c27

--047d7b673cc20b678a04fdee4c27
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

We won't be breaking plugins. I don't want to move to this for the reasons
stated before. This code also is way less maintainable, and looks like it
could break easily.  I really think that clarity should win out here over
an abuse of java reflection.

On 10 Jul,2014, at 17:15 , Anis KADRI <anis.kadri@gmail.com> wrote:

> I want to say that this should be default...but we won't change the API
> again and won't break plugins again.

Both could be supported at the same time, just by using a different base
class

--047d7b673cc20b678a04fdee4c27--