Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F002109EB for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 15:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79111 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2014 15:55:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 79061 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2014 15:55:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 79043 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2014 15:55:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:55:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.172] (HELO mail-vc0-f172.google.com) (209.85.220.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:55:38 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hy10so7208781vcb.17 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=9L/x34JT+bs8kXmodp8mliKR0A66RIyqwoSjvygG/0w=; b=w04Mi5ry9djAWKkBT4bm1X6mG7S3W3VqksyzeQnOoIaV8B6neLAWpLw2M3s/eR5zcx NqQvgzL0odFhaaZ2J6FpYOAJeCXwRgwHXYZm8XKobyVoQuMBjLwaVv/XTcxHPo9dMwax mWe2JXlngP7042EIz2iEDy1u9lnBdy7ZPvPbIILnYtAjXH95ckwUUCKbJnKp3daF+F/c e4bmKMgqbgaW8JSK7MjhX9ql36fHmWJdWhF6gtBSCKpe+QsabtbMuJgeRePMkuouyKeN m+qihwqGtn706EZvGYo0CZXW4FA9PWjtoAlIuTSpng/ZRR3O9tCSbiLhapk+pZxRQb70 /yGA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.172.5 with SMTP id ay5mr2974459vdc.38.1404921313639; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.241.208 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.241.208 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:55:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: webview as fragment on Android From: Joe Bowser To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c3b6d6457e04fdc4bbeb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0160c3b6d6457e04fdc4bbeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We should push this to 5.x. We're breaking too much stuff in 4.x. On Jul 9, 2014 8:49 AM, "Andrew Grieve" wrote: > I think it's been brought up a few times and is a real issue that we coul= d > address. Perhaps in 4.0.x? > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Marcel Kinard wrote= : > > > Someone asked me today about using a Cordova webview as a fragment on > > Android. Is this something that should work as is? > > > > At first glace, it doesn=E2=80=99t appear to be so, in the case where t= hey want > to > > do this on API11 which would trigger the Android v4 Support Library as = a > > pre-req and change the superclass of CordovaActivity from Activity to > > FragmentActivity. > > > > And there aren=E2=80=99t any docs on this topic in > > > http://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/3.5.0/guide_platforms_android_webview.m= d.html > > , so is this really a rare thing? Seems like a gap, or am I missing > > something? Thanks! > --089e0160c3b6d6457e04fdc4bbeb--