Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 59ED3111D6 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42531 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2014 19:49:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 42486 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2014 19:49:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 42474 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2014 19:49:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:49:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 19:48:57 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hu12so3069898vcb.20 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:48:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ytkQ4JB03QNKAVSOcyVoHHQcXMvTPXviapJACCGfbVo=; b=ZzkPAM80ip79Plv0H4f77FDFGsPXisc7HInM9WIVLPCuoAdvwFoRSdx8RzurBkF3YQ 6IyswgI2GN9LM5rmlvXznCVVQY9CWCyuqNTLnICRi/c7BQHgskroQAC7vLFImNGhYn7u nvWKfJEA2gH9fA0X9JWUUm+QhVIvHYVFe2NGyIJLlstoYihtbckTF5c9xh+RY1fR8fXi LEDL1JZ5iTo7fVIkQczZpkYUYaJq/6jb8DuVHthYgcrsL3BCekpQdAf1rQvWBgoQxxHd GXyTHwuJyhYn07kmtGAbc/jI7kRedwWj7u3XkwGtLP8aw3k11NAcWH4p9stf170dxY6f eBxA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.15.8 with SMTP id i8mr1865158vca.45.1405367316969; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.241.208 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:48:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <75f6f9749acc42fc9b9217776e748016@DM2PR03MB366.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <83abfcbd08b94574b4c7a93d12179f8b@DM2PR03MB366.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:48:36 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Monthly Cordova hangouts From: Joe Bowser To: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No, I'm actually back this week. I'll be in Portland next week for OSCON, so my availability will be even more sporatic than it is now. I'll be available for the hangout tomorrow. On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > Joe is still PTO (and hopefully enjoying the shit out of it) so that'll > have to wait > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH) < > panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> I added a couple of items for 3.6.0 release for Windows Universal apps. We >> also decided to talk about the min/max Android and iOS versions right >> (Joe's questions about this) ? >> >> @Lisa, would this be too early to talk about configurable folders in the >> CLI? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: brian.leroux@gmail.com [mailto:brian.leroux@gmail.com] On Behalf Of >> Brian LeRoux >> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:31 AM >> To: dev@cordova.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Monthly Cordova hangouts >> >> anyone want to take a stab at an agenda? (no major blockers/issues for us >> in Vancouver/SF atm) >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:49 AM, David Kemp wrote: >> >> > The call is scheduled for tomorrow evening. >> > On 14 Jul 2014 11:44, "Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)" < >> > panarasi@microsoft.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Just wondering if we already had the Monthly hangouts for this >> > > month. We usually have it on 15th every month, right ? >> > > Also, I remember that from the last hangout, we had trouble getting >> > > more than 10 people into the hangout. Do we want to try alternate >> > > solutions (Webex, Lync, or a conference bridge) that can let more >> > > people >> > participate? >> > > >> > >>