Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB69711BE3 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33096 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2014 19:23:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 33056 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2014 19:23:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 33043 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2014 19:23:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sosah.victor@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.173] (HELO mail-qc0-f173.google.com) (209.85.216.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:17 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id l6so4835214qcy.4 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:22:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=SUV2qGC64ToqN6wELyJnm0iv6xZJFg1528kxgpeaTzw=; b=Nofa3/ccfRQX8wcEpe0qwF0ll2IK4cJT8FHtvIPrwTHOTO5r0T2Jz/ptV/YZD6q4pK qYs99IMhDBnU8VML+xjCjl++gU6TOk2PhyT7k1vOTVWh+LDPi4GX9MJJihp8amy4dkqV SK33MH3iZ8mIRXqKDgKXIVItIJu+8MA0/NFHsT1KOlgkDrCuC1JHXKMwJYImxRpP49Lw n0N9t2oPH0DkaF8GFnY15hZSkm2M6X+onj4kysN/oZoqwuvX0L0qWe5kaeOByQos9tN6 tHb/jL6RxvOXUaPYueaadul5J6B6KKu7FqK2bXZmhouBISg9tw+J22MAM40Dvfs8K98l ZBcg== X-Received: by 10.224.80.67 with SMTP id s3mr36203310qak.92.1403896972814; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:22:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.20.208 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 12:22:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <31b8ed2cc4424a15833d9e6b1f5c9850@BL2PR03MB417.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> From: Victor Sosa Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:22:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Platforms 3.6.0 release timeline To: dev@cordova.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d7ec5db06704fcd63c83 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2d7ec5db06704fcd63c83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks for responding. This clears my question :-D 2014-06-27 14:19 GMT-05:00 Shazron : > Victor, > See our 2.9.x backporting support > http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/2.9.x%20Support > 3.0 was released on July 19th 2013, so 6 months later on January 19th, > 2014 our support for 2.x issues ended. > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Victor Sosa > wrote: > > Hello all. > > > > I'm not a committer, so the schedule is up to you guys ;-). But let me > see > > if I get this right: The 6-month deprecation means that after the release > > of 4.0 (presumably some day in October), developers have 6 months prior > > deprecating 3.x, meaning deprecation starts in April 2015? Or they have 6 > > months to update the 3.x projects to 4.x and in April 2015 3.x will not > be > > supported anymore? > > > > > > 2014-06-25 12:27 GMT-05:00 Joe Bowser : > > > >> OK, I think this is a little more realistic: > >> > >> 3.6 July > >> 3.7 September > >> 4.0 Oct > >> > >> It's summer, we're an Open Source project, and while I would like to > >> be ambitious, I'm also going on Vacation/Conferences and Speaking, and > >> I'm pretty sure other people are going to be coming and going during > >> those times as well. Given the turnout for our votes, I don't think > >> doing this at this rate is feasible unless we have all the > >> PMC/Committers available. > >> > >> Also, I'm cool with a 6 month deprecation for 3.x, just like we had > >> with 2.x, but I think we need to get a little meaner about it. If > >> you're reading this, STOP USING 2.9 AND UPGRADE. > >> > >> Joe > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >> > ideally we ship a point release every month and historically we'd be > >> > pushing to a MAJOR by the summer but this year we've slowed > >> > > >> > for my part, I'd like to start pushing faster again. on paper this > should > >> > be possible. something like this would be great > >> > > >> > 3.6 june > >> > 3.7 july > >> > 3.8 aug > >> > 3.9 sept > >> > 4.0 oct > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) < > >> > v-segreb@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> When the next core platforms releases will go out? Trying to find > this > >> >> information in mailing list w/o any success, not sure this has been > >> already > >> >> discussed. > >> >> > >> >> Thx! > >> >> Sergey > >> >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Victor Adrian Sosa Herrera > > IBM Software Engineer > > Guadalajara, Jalisco > -- Victor Adrian Sosa Herrera IBM Software Engineer Guadalajara, Jalisco --001a11c2d7ec5db06704fcd63c83--