Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of brian.leroux@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: brian.leroux@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABiQX1Ws7KL+20aQ3WRNZ+9oRDXLWUuUXxRusJ=U-hoCWqfQdg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMA9xmiPthCjN+PC5GZSQ6RuC-2Az3eMRoSAgxp-u+vrXfgFgw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABiQX1WX=iCumchJt0vSoG-hEtShL_mzxgmjp_bhRAFhT_P16A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEeF2TfUPqsWi+KgafMRs1K21Bn_eC6hPLH_MfaafarKqL5Rig@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMA9xmhvqH57DqG_2=OaGhp9EhdaxfSj7c3oPJV8ofkt2VHZWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEeF2Tfj0630tHUZXjSHSTRBKPLgdkenwLaWDX4rC6Mt63vd2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMA9xmij7VV64HVGVSpnEEV3gxxD9_NgOyyFir-yvCx7bnwhAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMSbhBi9r9Ebk3NuCz05W_f8j22tvq4G-tC31ac1-xcJdMaOuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyPftG6f8qpYjYK0mRAomaCHe6rGVn-g1aig6f1V88S6vQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS6=7iwv5Osyz8irpY5UjqFh9OoCpwuyQ0Y+ZK59SLXXLqttQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyN2jKdU1v9XDghZScyxEE-0SfEyPCp9vsL8SXrsM2LfzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS6=7hnVcfDX8VMMVnMks1SrzFrvqmdDqJtS+MPAr9f2PjsYw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyM8fm48ON04BcEYx3bTUcQvOKPvxkt8_HJhxyPgbXU39w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABiQX1Ws7KL+20aQ3WRNZ+9oRDXLWUuUXxRusJ=U-hoCWqfQdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 22:24:09 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CADVgkyOBCeah9LGJO1Eow7RfjN52B3scinRMjNUpCLsNMCAA4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: minor bump to cordova-lib
From: Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113441bc95ce3c04fb74897f

--001a113441bc95ce3c04fb74897f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

first what? A hotfix
On Jun 9, 2014 6:33 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:

> Marvin's email came across to me as respectful.
> Brian and Joe - your responses came across as disrespectful to me. Slow
> claps and sarcasm should probably be avoided in email.
>
> This issue has been covered at length, and the a very clear conclusion was
> made that unless policies change, anything published to npm that is
> intended for users outside of the project must first land on dist/.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>
> > Blind copy paste of URLs and blanket repeat emails are not helping
> either.
> > We can and do VOTE on artifacts.
> >
> > (And, FTR, I'm perfectly fine with the ceremony but I'd prefer we cast
> > votes as tags like we used to. A topic for the board and members to
> debate
> > to be sure.)
> >
> > Your earlier emails demonstrate well how little you understand of the
> > project. I'd recommend *actually* building Cordova *then* providing
> advice
> > about how to improve it and our release process. Seriously: it would
> help.
> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> > > /me slow clap
> >
> > Brian, I realize that you are deeply opposed to voting on releases, and I
> > understand and respect your arguments.  Were Cordova an independent
> > project, I
> > would not come to the community proposing that release voting be adopted.
> >
> > However, Cordova is at Apache and the policies are what they are.  You're
> > welcome to make the case that the org should change, but to be honest I
> > doubt
> > such a change is achievable in the near term.  The policy has deep roots
> --
> > a
> > good chunk of the Foundation's legal structure is built in its service.
> >  And
> > so I would argue that avoiding quixotic conflicts with the Board is in
> the
> > best interest of most Cordova stakeholders.
> >
> > In the meantime, the question is how to make the best of things within
> > existing constraints.  For the record, there's nothing stopping Cordova
> > from releasing on a fixed cadence.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
> >
>

--001a113441bc95ce3c04fb74897f--