Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DFA310C0A for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45065 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2014 19:27:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 44855 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2014 19:27:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 44845 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2014 19:27:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:27:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stevengill97@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.49] (HELO mail-qg0-f49.google.com) (209.85.192.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:27:20 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j107so195188qga.22 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:26:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aOMtK+AZpy2NF+BbHYCsxvfK/fozptM1kDkVQYe7gFI=; b=MGYl90zRf3TULSdQ8Q5rGweEFi05yagXZmTZnZt4MTb0fqappYm3aTdZ7XYfXNwurD F2N4zB+jSrGVKE9uzNHpqnqdSFtv0WDq7OcHI7B4u4PvZBbAnz5/AtcdULjyiRt7itV/ YhSoQhSck9N/FWc8x5h5szyiY7I2eSuylmS+Opoh0TtcUtrF9idHg737r+xUa1zYpPwd SUcs399waT6u5zlbtfdPzMN2lpNhr4jLzqwGpvYm7x2ZeoC4vJwv1iuRPkxZdrN1o4I3 w2HdC7qnS+rLN/nwa/h1uQGrbuCBuyIarkP+cwpaaR70vSAdXUO3lqPQPuhRdlWgDimE YIoA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.26.71 with SMTP id d7mr1393846qac.29.1397244417651; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.88.232 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.88.232 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:26:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5344F832.60003@gmail.com> <4e1f8634080e4a96b55d5175769c53e7@BY2PR02MB283.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:26:57 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: support on phonegap/cordova? ---- Request for Cordova User Group Mailing List From: Steven Gill To: dev@cordova.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149c5102db8d504f6c95168 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0149c5102db8d504f6c95168 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >From my experience of helping out on the PG google group, many people ask very simple questions and don't bother searching. My worries about having a users group: * searchability of answers. We would have to point people towards markmail to search (or Google) * lack of responding from committers. If we end up not being responsive, doesn't look good for Cordova. * flood of simple basic questions over and over With stack overflow, we can point users to a well established community for answering questions. Our community seems to enjoy gathering SO points and building rep. We take advantage of the search and ranking ability on SO. The cordova/phonegap tags are also very highly used and answered already. I agree with Michal that we should direct people to SO from our site. We also offer support on #cordova on freenode (even though this was intended to be more of a dev channel) My own personal thoughts about the PG Google group have been that we should migrate users to SO. Unfortunately, it is never easy forcing a well established community to change. +1 to stackoverflow. On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Steven Gill wrote: > +1 to Michal. > > I would prefer stack overflow over more email. > On Apr 11, 2014 7:58 AM, "Michal Mocny" wrote: > > > Not sure I would use the argument "make users less aware of phonegap" as > a > > reason for this ;) but I agree that its a bit confusing for existing > users > > of cordova core to be directed to phonegap support (see timely reply to > the > > original thread from another user). > > > > I much prefer directing user questions to stack overflow, though, where > > there is much better support for handling duplicate questions, > prioritizing > > useful answers, and you generally get much more community contributions > for > > answering questions, so I'd really prefer we advertise that avenue for > > support on our website first and foremost. > > > > For user questions that do need to go to a mailing list (is there ever a > > case?), I guess I don't mind which list it goes to (dev@ or users@). I > > just mind the inevitably frequent repetitive low quality questions by > users > > who just didn't do their research. Stack overflow solves that problem > much > > better. > > > > My 2cents. > > > > -Michal > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Bryan Higgins > >wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Lisa Seacat DeLuca < > ldeluca@us.ibm.com > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > After attending ApacheCon it was clear that most projects have a user > > > > group mailing list to handle questions like this rather than > forwarding > > > > people to a product specific distribution. I know there is a big > > > community > > > > around PhoneGap and the Google Group has a lot of great existing > > content > > > > but we should create a user group for Cordova to make developers more > > > aware > > > > that we exist. Right now if you ask a developer if they know what > > > Cordova > > > > is they stare at your blankly... but if you ask then what Phonegap is > > > they > > > > are more likely to know. This would be a small change that could go > a > > > long > > > > way to helping to disrupt that way of thinking. thoughts? +1's? > > > > > > > > > > > > Lisa > > > > > > > > Lisa Seacat DeLuca > > > > Mobile Engineer | t: +415.787.4589 | *ldeluca@apache.org*< > > > ldeluca@apache.org>| | > > > > *ldeluca@us.ibm.com* | *lisaseacat.com*< > > > http://www.lisaseacat.com/>| [image: > > > > follow @LisaSeacat on twitter] | > > > [image: > > > > follow Lisa Seacat DeLuca on linkedin]< > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/lisaseacat> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Andrew Grieve > > > > To: dev > > > > Date: 04/09/2014 06:16 PM > > > > Subject: Re: support on phonegap/cordova? > > > > Sent by: agrieve@google.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > StackOverflow works really well as well. If it's a possible but in > the > > > > framework or an Apache plugin though, this is the list :) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Ray Camden > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'd use the Google Group: > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/phonegap > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > > > From: smo > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 2:35 AM > > > > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > > > > > Subject: support on phonegap/cordova? > > > > > > > > > > hi > > > > > > > > > > where must i post to get support on phonegap/cordova ios ? > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --089e0149c5102db8d504f6c95168--