Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80954119ED for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7248 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2014 15:50:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 7180 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2014 15:50:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 7172 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2014 15:50:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:50:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.54] (HELO mail-qg0-f54.google.com) (209.85.192.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:50:46 +0000 Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z60so5588020qgd.13 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:50:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=VZyHuOIz17USPtUUVi5BDhLZrmRAJ7z9vX4QLnrBlOI=; b=nnzYk3Md476bFwSPZwQXDaiLn/ekK2jp4ceVErz6iylYXDjv5g3+fk4bS/69bG3T76 Sd2VRI/Pp9DcVR8zM3x/RVVZI/nhsH0QYGzKoKYDTT/EuJIxuiSnfmB1FYog3k+Jn+XS 2yeR9KXJOo84+wZS0UqrzJv0Vomt/gYLqWfcug6hbve+jPs/ytkiibO65XcDcVm9qybr 88UF4CqVMr4TWpuhBm9ohuSPNJJqAhySV+IlzkacDKJL6jmLh7qbNpjY6DDrNnPijd6p m2mqxfk072QBvMB6GcBJQgBdJBJ1Zq1SoMaMdnSIFUuY0V8g+rQP01ZwiobMwsdIkHTU QzhA== X-Received: by 10.140.16.198 with SMTP id 64mr53005166qgb.10.1398181814049; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:50:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.29.8 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:49:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Shazron Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:49:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Discuss] The Future of Ripple as a Top Level ASF Project To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Cc: "dev@ripple.incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c0ff125bc14004f7a392a4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c0ff125bc14004f7a392a4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 on absorbing Ripple On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Joe Bowser wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Brent Lintner > wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > Since becoming an incubator project (being donated graciously by > > BlackBerry), Ripple has seen positive contributions. > > > > However, it is also apparent that the community does not seem large > enough > > to sustain a project like this as a top level project (let alone an > > individual PMC). > > > > Three of the original contributors/creators of Ripple are now fully > > involved in a new technology startup in an unrelated field and therefore > we > > no longer have the resources to support Ripple in ASF. Also, BlackBerry > has > > given no resources to help since donating Ripple to the ASF (this might > be > > due to a change in their internal priorities). > > > > Given this, I would like to propose: > > > > 1. We find more community members willing to lead committership of the > > project, and see how that goes. > > > > 2. We also consider the eventuality of folding Ripple into another ASF > > project, if possible. If so, it would seem Cordova is a candidate for > this, > > especially given the project being one of Ripple's main focus and > support. > > If the community votes for this, we should involve the Cordova community > to > > gage their interests as well (I've CC'd their mailing list in this > email). > > I'd +1 this. I'd like to see Ripple live on in some form if people > are still using it, even though I don't use it personally. > > > > > 3. If the above does not work out, I would then suggest we consider the > > most unfortunate (put perhaps prudent) eventuality, which is to "fail" > > Ripple as an incubator project. "fail" is this case, not being negative. > > > > So, Incubator projects can't go into the Attic? That's what the ASF > does with projects that become inactive after they leave incubator. > I'm sure the ASF doesn't want to get into the habit of taking > abandoned projects and shoving everything into the attic, so I'd > rather see it get included in Cordova as one of the less active > repositories. > --001a11c0ff125bc14004f7a392a4--