Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kamrik@google.com designates
 209.85.160.174 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADVgkyOvBBfEL09a=iHSKuZb+KNVB0w5N9Nt=VPCMeRw-6qJ1w@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CA+GVa3ZnL1deYsF5FLQA-0s1iQN8HongZ6s2UtzSnZFj7ccYUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABiQX1WN6TizB63giNw5zwT=um8NHE9O3x2BseryBVsMbOt7Og@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyNm=yaT2E9kbyTv86po2ZF4b45k_Qn+X0JwihidM3u4=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMSbhBiLE6uJNJpw6=ytgSB=Hf9PXJtYoephPF4NBtKVkET_KA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+GVa3Z35-N4WuZW0aSX5aTR2SqJZzvj8htqqjLE2s9SGqMfWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyNZEvVJTFmUL9UWYJf6GAOd0BKXSRobE3WE-oJePxGDFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHYtTqnHHEabScopRwQY4pZpwJy0N_grFY_Qgq1gFFAfdZaXsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyOfVgH6=S+RvOd4gs75VVi4T4zV1JMM501i9nkGixir7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHYtTqnGiMK99gdMgZqL_Xt1zkHM3zsaNQg2YSJifhJWv=85_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADVgkyOvBBfEL09a=iHSKuZb+KNVB0w5N9Nt=VPCMeRw-6qJ1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:50:58 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CA+GVa3YG0XG3km5N60bHND_X_bRhFqK_QqvOAKzLj9OFbt-G5g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal for cli and plugman code rearrangement
From: Mark Koudritsky <kamrik@google.com>
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e015381b0d7cef604f72f12c4

--089e015381b0d7cef604f72f12c4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Ok, according to the doodle <http://doodle.com/uvyr9454pvepz3a3> tomorrow
14:00 Eastern = 11:00 Pacific seems to be an ok time. (I hope I got the
time zones right).
Let's organized a hangout tomorrow.

For the calendars:
Thursday, April 17, 14:00 ET
Thursday, April 17, 11:00 PT


On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:

> To clear up my intent, I'm proposing
>
> 1. Keep the Plugman and Cordova/CLI as separate repos that we publish as
> discreet modules (and use npm / package.json to manage deps)
> 2. Create a new placeholder repo for staging common module extraction
> called cordova-lib
> 3. Publish many modules from this one git repo called cordova-lib and
> prefix any module from it with `cordova-lib` (for example
> cordova-lib-app-create would be a great module for sharing)
> 4. Evaluate if any modules can graduate from cordova-lib to more generally
> useful status and get their own git repos
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Brian
> > yep I agree with directory "cordova-lib", "node_modules", "common".
> > "common-lib"
> > I think we are on the same page.
> >
> > What do you mean by "published"? in "-package.json (published as
> > cordova-lib-plugin-install)"
> >
> > no actually publishing to npm registry, but just having a convention for
> > the naming of the modules all starting with "cordova-lib-*" and matching
> > location within repo?
> >
> > {
> >   "version": "0.0.1",
> >   "name": "cordova-lib-plugin-install",
> >   ..
> >   }
> >
> > {
> >   "version": "0.0.1",
> >   "name": "cordova-lib-util-a",
> >   ..
> >   }
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm thinking a clean path might look something like this:
> > >
> > > plugman
> > > '-package.json -> cordova-lib-plugin-install
> > >
> > > cordova-cli
> > > '-package.json -> cordova-lib-plugin-install
> > >
> > > cordova-lib
> > > |-plugin-install
> > > |  '-package.json (published as cordova-lib-plugin-install)
> > > etc
> > >
> > > Wherein all the 'meat' ends up in cordova-lib and plugman/cordova-cli
> > > become light CLI wrappers. I don't see any reason we change/remove the
> > > already extracted repos for the CLI and Plugman.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was going to suggest node_modules but I think it doesn't work for
> us
> > > > since we have two top level npm pacakges. If one top level npm
> pacakge
> > in
> > > > the repo then its fine.
> > > >
> > > > |cli
> > > > | '-package.json
> > > > | '-node_modules/util_a
> > > > |plugman
> > > > | '-package.json
> > > > | '-node_modules/util_a
> > > >
> > > > means "util_a" will be duplicated in repo
> > > > plugman/node_modules/util_a
> > > > cli/node_modules/util_a
> > > >
> > > > or
> > > > if you have
> > > > node_module/util_a at the root, npm link ../node_modules/util_a still
> > > needs
> > > > to be done for cli and plugman node modules.
> > > >
> > > > that's why I suggested to do the node_modules at dev/publish time to
> > > > populate the both node_modules one for cli and one for plugman
> > > >
> > > > Or maybe I missed something.
> > > >
> > > > The tag for smaller modules, might be tricky but at the same time not
> > > > necessary if they are consider bundle/private and living in same repo
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Brian for putting the question out there on twitter
> interesting
> > > > feedback.
> > > >
> > > > --Carlos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I thought the node_modules comment might have been cheeky.
> > (Suggesting
> > > we
> > > > > use npm to manage deps.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Crap. Totally forgot about Good Friday. I have a one hour window
> open
> > > on
> > > > > Thu. =(
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Mark Koudritsky <
> kamrik@google.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The tip about placing the deps under node_modules right away
> sounds
> > > > very
> > > > > > useful. This way the dev environment will be ready right after
> git
> > > > clone;
> > > > > > npm install with no extra magic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This Friday is a holiday in Canada (Good Friday).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Steven Gill <
> > stevengill97@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Git tags are not something we have talked about yet. Thanks for
> > > > sharing
> > > > > > > Brian!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > hey guys could we add Fri to that doodle?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I asked around for opinions and got some interesting
> responses
> > to
> > > > add
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > the discussion:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/brianleroux/status/456242928298381312
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > (Nothing really negative or positive.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2014 6:34 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <
> agrieve@chromium.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We didn't have time to cover this today, but I think it's
> > > better
> > > > > off
> > > > > > > > > as its own hangout anyways.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Created a doodle for Wed/Thurs. Add yourself if you'd like
> to
> > > > > > > > > participate in the discussion.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > http://doodle.com/uvyr9454pvepz3a3
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Mark Koudritsky <
> > > > > kamrik@google.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > A short proposal<
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GVtG6BD266dqRURKaS-GEDefb0tBYt56acxrJEKAfmE/edit
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > how to rearrange cli and plugman code. Let's discuss it
> > > during
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > hangout
> > > > > > > > > > today. Feel free to comment.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Santana
> > > > <csantana23@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Santana
> > <csantana23@gmail.com>
> >
>

--089e015381b0d7cef604f72f12c4--