Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of purplecabbage@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.192.178 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.5.0
References: 
 <CAMSbhBjA6pBc-EpTmT6hWN824yJ+--BMQkyQf-Qt2q9T3asBFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEeF2TeRt1rKFRwbcF3xEFPge-=doksPE_CZGMhS5gz6edSycg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOBL_k5jNJOMJM_mXbw=bpxrHf6pgpbck0VRmC0KP4A_ASiSYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1XaTLMyxDcNjhbscs0xDgm3_eNUUDk1NK5MtxWqF+vnwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADVgkyO2drMahY+DvZES2wGDKbm6PrMqV2PTFN0wcvaaasVyog@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZUa22uHihgkTpsoQGS9b6sFShEaNJHBFceyooEpXfqkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1XJVPe20era6z2mhFQmwEDMHpRbOO7K2YnPg=kaYurqNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZWoN1mEkdmJ9SzTA2qfPJdbN74+8jxBp9b4SFti194Dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1V_G5qM62zL0uNViudwzMnB7Fk2DEU0+jv+QhOzvrGn6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOBL_k7N_c_rk1-8arRVCTGGP6kzMrmBzYz8FO0o9BsJmSyQJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZRhjqAeqxvtSvitS-ZPvkrjSWyKfKUp8et=EVP1tEAOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBh2wZZkN+EedFESFXS+hpdXDQGxPnD3nDx2WK9KmwH+kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEeF2TdMu1weac5aYgGSyk1-Km6dMiVRQhDuXbc=h2TBgw6i6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <49D7136A-17DB-4C18-B32E-B7514ED5850A@gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1VTfUXzNxNEr+kGHLTAcJaNwBH+rYRH9rCjQD0WWtQqRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBjHZfdK6OaEKtmVMMTW9xMXXKr2GCUAaEHSNW4sTgX9uw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-b=Pipk0VxPqpz7WW5JS4_1ztcagkZGhU=fWohHtx22ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-avCd3CLMwrVF+0gGauBka7vAShotzgWn=wZfmQc10QoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-YHE6R8=sDfBTDjR=T7Ut7vV0EUbUrr3_L_6q2WZ7uqqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBhuk8Z-NXLUbOCw8PiuziPcAk2j=Uj=OfHn83bFAe+mfg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEeF2Tc-zY4N0u9N28T_HHXg+QcwKiOU8tcJhAQqz-uSYetePw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1X4xDk3vbzvzXQ_+N8KwiXmxdth9248JonLq7xys-QVjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD_dpu1DMbLi-U5wgOAvwTUonUasv5G-ep73+R3O1jNX8ohF1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBjTa_eN3aLAYYnu=sSZAdSZ46XEd_8Db2UcNf5E0Od=sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <685292e756d5450bb3b121d1acbb4e6e@BLUPR03MB359.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: purplecabbage <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: 
 <685292e756d5450bb3b121d1acbb4e6e@BLUPR03MB359.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Message-Id: <533ee634.6289420a.39c8.fffffa1a@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:04:52 -0700
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)

I would like to see 3.5.0 ready to vote on late next week. I have some house=
 keeping to do, as there are big fixes for windows 8 and wp8 that need to be=
 pushed out. I've been away for /build so haven't been able to do much this w=
eek.=20

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:07 AM, "Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)" <panara=
si@microsoft.com> wrote:
>=20
> Once 3.4.1 is release, how long before we start looking at 3.5.0 ?=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengill97@gmail.com]=20
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 10:52 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.5.0
>=20
> I just noticed Shaz tagged 3.4.1 a few days ago. I will move forward with t=
his now.
>=20
>=20
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com>wrot=
e:
>=20
>> Hi !
>>=20
>> Sorry to bump this thread up but any estimate on when 3.4.1 will be=20
>> released ? The xcode 5.1 issue is quite blocking for a lot of users.
>>=20
>> Regards,
>> Seb
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>=20
>>> I think our new flow is that *anything* meant for end users should=20
>>> go on dist/, and it's the other channels (npm) that are optional.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> I expect that if it is going out to users it should have a vote. =20
>>>> Since
>>> we
>>>> need to roll CLI to actually surface this to users, we can=20
>>>> probably
>> vote
>>>> for both at that time.
>>>>=20
>>>> -Michal
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Steven Gill=20
>>>> <stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> I think we can vote on it when we vote on the tools.
>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2014 4:43 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> I assume this does not need a vote since it doesn't go in the=20
>>>>>> dist
>>>>> folder,
>>>>>> and only downloaded by the CLI tool?
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> iOS: Changes are in the 3.4.x branch, and 3.4.1 is tagged.=20
>>>>>>> I'll
>> do
>>>> more
>>>>>>> testing over the weekend.
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Shazron=20
>>>>>>> <shazron@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Yeah lets do a 3.4.1 iOS, simpler for now until we figure=20
>>>>>>>> out
>> any
>>>> new
>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>> regarding independent releases.
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> Plan:
>>>>>>>> - branch off 3.4.0 release
>>>>>>>> - cherry-pick commits for template changes, script changes,
>>> callback
>>>>> id
>>>>>>>> change (to allow callback ids with periods in them)
>>>>>>>> - version it 3.4.1 in VERSION in this branch only
>>>>>>>> - version it 3.4.1 in CDVAvailability.h (copy back to=20
>>>>>>>> master as
>>>> well).
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Steven Gill <
>>>> stevengill97@gmail.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> I don't have any problem with going the 3.4.1 route. It=20
>>>>>>>>> would
>> be
>>>>>> simpler
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> terms of docs + js.
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> Shazron, would that work for you?
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2014 8:27 AM, "Andrew Grieve"=20
>>>>>>>>> <agrieve@chromium.org
>>>=20
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> =46rom what I understand of the changes, it should work=20
>>>>>>>>>> fine to
>>> do
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> 3.4.1
>>>>>>>>>> and just leave the JS as is.
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Marcel Kinard <
>>>> cmarcelk@gmail.com
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> It feels like trying to tag only iOS as 3.5.0 before=20
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> other
>>>>>>>>> platforms
>>>>>>>>>>> is going to create a mess when it comes time to=20
>>>>>>>>>>> release the
>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> platforms, especially if there are subsequent changes=20
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>> cordova-js
>>>>>>>>>> and/or
>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-ios. I don't like moving tags. So +1 to=20
>>>>>>>>>>> Michal's
>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 27, 2014, at 9:56 PM, Michal Mocny <
>> mmocny@google.com
>>>>=20
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I even try to grok the other questions, why=20
>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>> we
>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> tag
>>>>>>>>>> iOS
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.4.1?
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the long-term answer for doing away with the
>> cadence
>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> version all the platforms separately, like how we do=20
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>> the
>>>>>> plugins
>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Steven Gill <
>>>>>>>>> stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The best course of action for the future is to set=20
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> build
>>>>>>>>> label in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordovajs to be just the sha.
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe in the future, the build label in cordova-js=20
>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>> floats
>>>>>>>>> separate
>>>>>>>>>>> from the versions of all the platforms. Yeah, perhaps=20
>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>> just
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> sha.
>>>>>>>>>>> Every git repo has its own master and own independent
>>>> versioning
>>>>>>>>>> sequence.
>>>>>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>>>>> That does beg the question if there is some kind of=20
>>>>>>>>>>> overall
>>>>>> snapshot
>>>>>>>>> id
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> replace the cadver, and when do we do Apache releases=20
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>> dist.
>>=20