cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Victor Sosa <sosah.vic...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposal for cli and plugman code rearrangement
Date Wed, 16 Apr 2014 21:44:55 GMT
Is this agreed? Are we going to have the meeting on Thursday, April 17,
14:00 ET?
Who's going to send the hangout invite?


2014-04-16 16:40 GMT-05:00 tommy-carlos williams <tommy@devgeeks.org>:

> Cruel.
>
> The only difference in the Doodle between 2pm PST and 4pm+ PST is Jesse
> and Brian.
>
> This won’t be forgotten. You two are on my list now ;)
>
> 4am on Good Friday, here I come. Yay?
>
> - tommy
>
> On 17 April 2014 at 6:51:47 am, Mark Koudritsky (kamrik@google.com) wrote:
>
> Ok, according to the doodle <http://doodle.com/uvyr9454pvepz3a3> tomorrow
> 14:00 Eastern = 11:00 Pacific seems to be an ok time. (I hope I got the
> time zones right).
> Let's organized a hangout tomorrow.
>
> For the calendars:
> Thursday, April 17, 14:00 ET
> Thursday, April 17, 11:00 PT
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>
> > To clear up my intent, I'm proposing
> >
> > 1. Keep the Plugman and Cordova/CLI as separate repos that we publish as
> > discreet modules (and use npm / package.json to manage deps)
> > 2. Create a new placeholder repo for staging common module extraction
> > called cordova-lib
> > 3. Publish many modules from this one git repo called cordova-lib and
> > prefix any module from it with `cordova-lib` (for example
> > cordova-lib-app-create would be a great module for sharing)
> > 4. Evaluate if any modules can graduate from cordova-lib to more
> generally
> > useful status and get their own git repos
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Carlos Santana <csantana23@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Brian
> > > yep I agree with directory "cordova-lib", "node_modules", "common".
> > > "common-lib"
> > > I think we are on the same page.
> > >
> > > What do you mean by "published"? in "-package.json (published as
> > > cordova-lib-plugin-install)"
> > >
> > > no actually publishing to npm registry, but just having a convention
> for
> > > the naming of the modules all starting with "cordova-lib-*" and
> matching
> > > location within repo?
> > >
> > > {
> > > "version": "0.0.1",
> > > "name": "cordova-lib-plugin-install",
> > > ..
> > > }
> > >
> > > {
> > > "version": "0.0.1",
> > > "name": "cordova-lib-util-a",
> > > ..
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm thinking a clean path might look something like this:
> > > >
> > > > plugman
> > > > '-package.json -> cordova-lib-plugin-install
> > > >
> > > > cordova-cli
> > > > '-package.json -> cordova-lib-plugin-install
> > > >
> > > > cordova-lib
> > > > |-plugin-install
> > > > | '-package.json (published as cordova-lib-plugin-install)
> > > > etc
> > > >
> > > > Wherein all the 'meat' ends up in cordova-lib and plugman/cordova-cli
> > > > become light CLI wrappers. I don't see any reason we change/remove
> the
> > > > already extracted repos for the CLI and Plugman.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Carlos Santana <
> csantana23@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I was going to suggest node_modules but I think it doesn't work for
> > us
> > > > > since we have two top level npm pacakges. If one top level npm
> > pacakge
> > > in
> > > > > the repo then its fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > |cli
> > > > > | '-package.json
> > > > > | '-node_modules/util_a
> > > > > |plugman
> > > > > | '-package.json
> > > > > | '-node_modules/util_a
> > > > >
> > > > > means "util_a" will be duplicated in repo
> > > > > plugman/node_modules/util_a
> > > > > cli/node_modules/util_a
> > > > >
> > > > > or
> > > > > if you have
> > > > > node_module/util_a at the root, npm link ../node_modules/util_a
> still
> > > > needs
> > > > > to be done for cli and plugman node modules.
> > > > >
> > > > > that's why I suggested to do the node_modules at dev/publish time
> to
> > > > > populate the both node_modules one for cli and one for plugman
> > > > >
> > > > > Or maybe I missed something.
> > > > >
> > > > > The tag for smaller modules, might be tricky but at the same time
> not
> > > > > necessary if they are consider bundle/private and living in same
> repo
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Brian for putting the question out there on twitter
> > interesting
> > > > > feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Carlos
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I thought the node_modules comment might have been cheeky.
> > > (Suggesting
> > > > we
> > > > > > use npm to manage deps.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Crap. Totally forgot about Good Friday. I have a one hour window
> > open
> > > > on
> > > > > > Thu. =(
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Mark Koudritsky <
> > kamrik@google.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The tip about placing the deps under node_modules right
away
> > sounds
> > > > > very
> > > > > > > useful. This way the dev environment will be ready right
after
> > git
> > > > > clone;
> > > > > > > npm install with no extra magic.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This Friday is a holiday in Canada (Good Friday).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Steven Gill <
> > > stevengill97@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Git tags are not something we have talked about yet.
Thanks
> for
> > > > > sharing
> > > > > > > > Brian!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > hey guys could we add Fri to that doodle?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I asked around for opinions and got some interesting
> > responses
> > > to
> > > > > add
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > the discussion:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/brianleroux/status/456242928298381312
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > (Nothing really negative or positive.)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2014 6:34 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <
> > agrieve@chromium.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We didn't have time to cover this today,
but I think it's
> > > > better
> > > > > > off
> > > > > > > > > > as its own hangout anyways.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Created a doodle for Wed/Thurs. Add yourself
if you'd
> like
> > to
> > > > > > > > > > participate in the discussion.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://doodle.com/uvyr9454pvepz3a3
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Mark Koudritsky
<
> > > > > > kamrik@google.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > A short proposal<
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GVtG6BD266dqRURKaS-GEDefb0tBYt56acxrJEKAfmE/edit
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > how to rearrange cli and plugman code.
Let's discuss it
> > > > during
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > hangout
> > > > > > > > > > > today. Feel free to comment.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Santana
> > > > > <csantana23@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Santana
> > > <csantana23@gmail.com>
> > >
> >
>
>


-- 
Victor Adrian Sosa Herrera
IBM Software Engineer
Guadalajara, Jalisco

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message