cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian LeRoux...@brian.io>
Subject Re: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
Date Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:50:22 GMT
So I found a Moz hacker whom can help. what time on Fri do you guys want to
do this?


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Ian Clelland <iclelland@chromium.org>wrote:

> I've managed to get this up and running now -- great work on this, Joe!
>
> Mobilespec runs on my N4, with 10 failing tests: 3 in contacts; 7 in
> file-transfer. Otherwise, things seem to be working pretty well.
>
> I used a new build of Crosswalk, and found that the embedding API has
> changed since the weekend (when Ningxin's patches applied). I've issued a
> pull request at
> https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/5for it --
> I'm not sure if there's a way to keep compatibility with last
> week's Crosswalk, or if we'd even want to. (Ningxin, if you could take a
> look at that PR and see if it makes sense, I'd appreciate it)
>
> Joe, I also had to patch the default constructor for XWalkCordovaWebView;
> it wasn't creating its own client objects, so it got the default ones, and
> most of the tests were failing because some component of the bridge wan't
> working. https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/4 is
> out
> for that.
>
> Count me in for the hangout -- this is exciting stuff
>
> Ian
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
>
> > Yup I'll track em down
> > On Apr 23, 2014 7:17 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone have a contact at moz that we could invite?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Depends on their interest level I think. Faster we can get this out
> > > > the door the better. If we need to delay for geckoview, then I don't
> > > > think we should gate on it, just release it after.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Tommy Williams <tommy@devgeeks.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> More engines, more better...
> > > >> On 23 Apr 2014 16:32, "Joe Bowser" <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hey
> > > >>>
> > > >>> A Hangout would have to happen on Friday at the earliest.  It'd
be
> > > good if
> > > >>> we could get someone from Mozilla on the hangout as well.  I
> haven't
> > > gotten
> > > >>> MozillaView (GeckoView with Cordova methods) fully working yet.
>  For
> > > some
> > > >>> reason it's not rendering on the screen.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Ideally it'd be cool to have at least two options when this feature
> > > finally
> > > >>> lands.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What do other people think?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Joe
> > > >>> On 22 Apr 2014 20:06, "Hu, Ningxin" <ningxin.hu@intel.com>
wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Joe,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Thanks for your review and merge the PRs.
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > To pluggable webview interest group:
> > > >>> > Are we OK to setup a hangout this week for initial introduction
> and
> > > >>> > discussion of next steps?
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > Thanks,
> > > >>> > -ningxin
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> > > From: Hu, Ningxin [mailto:ningxin.hu@intel.com]
> > > >>> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:04 PM
> > > >>> > > To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > > >>> > > Subject: RE: [Android] Refactoring for different engines
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > The PoC is great! Quite excited about the direction!
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > I've sent a PR to update the cordova-crosswalk-engine
to latest
> > > >>> crosswalk
> > > >>> > > embedding API. It works with xwalk_core_library at 6.35.124.0.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > I've also changed the CordovaWebView interface slightly
(adding
> > > >>> > getView() API)
> > > >>> > > to allow XWalkCordovaWebView to composite a XWalkView
instead
> of
> > > >>> > extending
> > > >>> > > it. It resolves some API naming issues for XWalkView
case.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Please review them at:
> > > >>> > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/3
> > > >>> > > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/pull/2
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Thanks,
> > > >>> > > -ningxin
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> > > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bowserj@gmail.com]
> > > >>> > > > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 12:45 AM
> > > >>> > > > To: dev
> > > >>> > > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for different
engines
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > Yeah, I'd be cool with setting up a hangout.  Everyone
should
> > > take a
> > > >>> > > > look at the PoC, I've basically distilled it down
to four or
> > five
> > > >>> > > > classes so far, but with some work, we may be able
to get it
> > > down to
> > > >>> > > > three.  Due to legacy, we're pretty stuck with
the Android
> > > WebView
> > > >>> API
> > > >>> > calls,
> > > >>> > > but these can probably be modified.
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > It'd be good to get Mozilla people on the call
as well, since
> > > they
> > > >>> > > > have their WebView as well.
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Hu, Ningxin <
> > > ningxin.hu@intel.com>
> > > >>> > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > > Hangout would be a good idea.
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > FYI, I will be off next week. How about the
week after
> next?
> > > If it
> > > >>> > > > > works, please
> > > >>> > > > feel free to schedule one and count me in.
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > Thanks,
> > > >>> > > > > -ningxin
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> > > > >> From: mmocny@google.com [mailto:mmocny@google.com]
On
> > Behalf
> > > Of
> > > >>> > > > >> Michal Mocny
> > > >>> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:39 PM
> > > >>> > > > >> To: dev
> > > >>> > > > >> Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring for
different engines
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> Would it be alright to set up a Hangout
some time to
> > introduce
> > > >>> > everyone?
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> Joe has been leading the effort here,
but there are other
> > > cordova
> > > >>> > > > >> contributors for whom this is top priority.
 It would be
> > nice
> > > if
> > > >>> we
> > > >>> > > > >> could all meet to say hello and make sure
we are all going
> > in
> > > the
> > > >>> > > > >> right
> > > >>> > > > direction.
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> Quite exciting!
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> -Michal
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Hu, Ningxin
<
> > > >>> ningxin.hu@intel.com>
> > > >>> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > Joe, thanks for this. I am very excited.
> > > >>> > > > >> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > FYI. Crosswalk team is working on
refactoring the
> WebView
> > > API to
> > > >>> > > > >> > support embedding usage better [1].
(Previously the
> layer
> > > API
> > > >>> was
> > > >>> > > > >> > not exposed as public usage).
> > > >>> > > > >> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > I would like to review the PoC and
work with you to get
> > > >>> Crosswalk
> > > >>> > > > >> > fits into the pluggable WebView architecture.
> > > >>> > > > >> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >>> > > > >> > -ningxin
> > > >>> > > > >> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > >>> > > > >> > > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bowserj@gmail.com]
> > > >>> > > > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014
7:08 AM
> > > >>> > > > >> > > To: dev
> > > >>> > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [Android] Refactoring
for different
> engines
> > > >>> > > > >> > >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > Hey
> > > >>> > > > >> > >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > After debugging, I did some
minor updates to the
> plugin
> > > >>> README.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > It
> > > >>> > > > >> > should be
> > > >>> > > > >> > > easier to get this up and running,
although there's
> > still
> > > the
> > > >>> > > > >> > > issue of
> > > >>> > > > >> > after-install
> > > >>> > > > >> > > hooks and the relative path
weirdness with the
> Crosswalk
> > > >>> > Library itself.
> > > >>> > > > >> > >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > It still doesn't support the
CLI at all, but it should
> > be
> > > >>> there
> > > >>> > > > >> > > with the
> > > >>> > > > >> > old flow.
> > > >>> > > > >> > >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:14
PM, Michal Mocny
> > > >>> > > > >> > > <mmocny@chromium.org>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > > (Sorry Joe, Googlers are
down in California and way
> > > busy.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > > Will be back in a week.
 Super excited about this,
> > > though.)
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > > -Michal
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at
2:53 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > >>> > > > >> > > > <bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > >>> > > > >> wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> Reviving this thread!
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> Can other people look
at this, and see if/when we
> > > should
> > > >>> > land this?
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> I know that I have
to re-write the tests still,
> but I
> > > would
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> like some feedback
before merging it in.  Also,
> it'd
> > be
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> super awesome if other
people could try and make a
> > > WebView
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> based on the interfaces
and recommend which methods
> > > should
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> die.  I want to get
this released in the next month
> > or
> > > so,
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> so any time and feedback
would be greatly
> > appreciated.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> Thanks
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014
at 3:50 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> <bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > >>> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Hey, I created
the following today to track
> various
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > WebView
> > > >>> > > > >> > progresses:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6246
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > I also have this
repo created.  The licensing is
> > > ugly as
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > all crap, but
it's a Proof-Of-Concept:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >
> > https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-crosswalk-engine
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > If I can get some
help getting plugman to just
> load
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > Crosswalk, it'll
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> look hawt.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > BTW: We should
probably get this ready to go into
> > > Android
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > in the next two
months and deprecate the
> > setProperty
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > methods, since
all properties should be
> preferences
> > > in
> > > >>> > config.xml
> > > >>> > > now.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Mar 10,
2014 at 2:42 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > <bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> Perhaps. There
would be additional benefits to
> > this
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> approach,
namely fixes being added to that
> > platform
> > > more
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> quickly. 
I'll probably take a look at that
> once I
> > > have
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> Crosswalk
> > > >>> > > > finalized.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> On Mon, Mar
10, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Brian LeRoux
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >> <b@brian.io>
> > > >>> > > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> this is
great stuff
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> do we
think it may be possible to bring in
> amazon
> > > >>> fireos
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> stuff
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> eventually
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> too?
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> On Fri,
Mar 7, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>> <bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > >>> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> BTW:
I committed it in my repo, not the main
> > > Apache
> > > >>> one.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> On
Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Joe Bowser
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> <bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
Hey
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
I just committed some code based on their
> > > WebView
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
modifications that allows you to choose your
> > > >>> renderer
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
in the
> > > >>> > > > >> > config file
> > > >>> > > > >> > > with this:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
    <preference name="webView"
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >>> value="org.apache.cordova.engine.crosswalk.XWalkCordo
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
va
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
Web
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
View
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
" />
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
You currently have to copy over the *.pak
> file
> > > and
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
the jsapi from a Crosswalk Example project
> to
> > > get
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
this to work.  The next thing that I'm going
> > to
> > > do
> > > >>> is
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
figure out how to write this as a plugin and
> > > have it
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
install on a default
> > > >>> > > > project.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
Also, right now the bridge doesn't seem to
> > > work, and
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
I don't know why exactly.  That being said,
> > the
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> fact
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
that I can choose which version of
> > > Chrome/Chromium
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
I'm running with
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> a
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
single XML preference is HUGE.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
There's definitely a lot more work that
> needs
> > > to be
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
done, but as
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> long
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
as we have something that we can fit into
> the
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
interface, we should
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> be
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
able to put in things like GeckoView or
> other
> > > third
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
party
> > > >>> > > > >> > renderers.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
The nightmare of being stuck with bullshit
> > > WebView
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
bugs may soon be over.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Michal Mocny
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >
<mmocny@chromium.org>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >>> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordo
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
va
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
-an
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
droi
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
d
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
First patch they landed, which claims to
> have
> > > min
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
viable xwalk
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> webview:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >>> https://github.com/crosswalk-project/crosswalk-cordova-andro
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> id
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> /co
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> mmit
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> /a04dedeb0204e7542d190312c6ae70c795a26e04
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Michal
> Mocny
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
<mmocny@chromium.org
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
I haven't looked yet, but did you see:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >>> https://crosswalk-project.org/#wiki/crosswalk-cordo
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
va
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
-an
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
droi
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
d
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
?
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Andrew
> > > Grieve <
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> agrieve@chromium.org
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
First - very excited that you're working
> on
> > > this!
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
Had a quick look. Not sure there's much
> to
> > be
> > > >>> > gleaned
> > > >>> > > yet.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
Once
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> you
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> start
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
in on hooking up x-walk's webview I think
> > it
> > > will
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
become more
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> obvious
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> what
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
the interface should look like. E.g.,
> does
> > > x-walk
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
even have the
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> concept
of
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
ChromeClient vs WebViewClient vs WebView?
> > > Also
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
unsure whether the
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> class
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
should extend android.View as well as
> > > implement
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
our
> > > >>> > > > >> > interface.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> E.g.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
alternative is to have a "getView()"
> method
> > > on
> > > >>> the
> > > >>> > > > >> > interface.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> Might
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> help
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
to
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
cut down on file sizes, and API surface,
> > but
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
again, I'm not too
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> sure.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
I've been pretty hesitant to touch
> existing
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
exposed members
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> (e.g. the
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
public fields you were referring to)
> since
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
touching anything
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> public
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> could
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
break plugins. That said, maybe now is a
> > good
> > > >>> time
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
to @deprecate
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> a
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> bunch
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
of
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
them and either replace them with
> getters,
> > or
> > > >>> just
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
declare them
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> to be
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> not
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
exposed to plugins.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Joe
> Bowser
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
<bowserj@gmail.com>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> So, after looking at the Crosswalk code
> > > again,
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> I've decided to
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> take
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> a
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> quick stab at making things pluggable.
>  I
> > > don't
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> have a lot to
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> show
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> for
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> it, but with the help of Eclipse (which
> > is
> > > why
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> the generated interfaces look so
> screwed
> > > up), I
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> managed to create some
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> interfaces
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> so
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> we can start shoehorning in other
> browser
> > > >>> > renderers.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >>> https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/pluggable_w
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> eb
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> vie
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> w
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> I'm going to probably start with
> > Crosswalk,
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> because it's
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> probably
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> the
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> most mature primary candidate in the
> > > Android
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> Third-Party
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> WebView
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> thing, and I'm pretty sure the
> GeckoView
> > > will
> > > >>> be
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> happening
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> shortly
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> after.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> I don't know how this would work w.r.t.
> > > the CLI
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> or our
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> workflow at
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> all, but at the moment, I really just
> > want
> > > to
> > > >>> at
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> least start
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> to have
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> some headway towards 4.x and PhoneGap
> > day.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> What do people think of this so far?
> I'm
> > > going
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> to try to clean
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> things
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> up a bit, since we've definitely done a
> > > lot of
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> things that
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> would
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> make
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> first year CS profs freak the hell out
> > > (i.e.
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> public members in
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> public
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> objects w.r.t. PluginManager).
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> Thoughts?
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> Joe
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>> >>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >> >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message