cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From purplecabbage <purplecabb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.5.0
Date Fri, 04 Apr 2014 17:04:52 GMT
I would like to see 3.5.0 ready to vote on late next week. I have some house keeping to do,
as there are big fixes for windows 8 and wp8 that need to be pushed out. I've been away for
/build so haven't been able to do much this week. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 4, 2014, at 9:07 AM, "Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)" <panarasi@microsoft.com>
wrote:
> 
> Once 3.4.1 is release, how long before we start looking at 3.5.0 ? 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengill97@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 10:52 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.5.0
> 
> I just noticed Shaz tagged 3.4.1 a few days ago. I will move forward with this now.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> Hi !
>> 
>> Sorry to bump this thread up but any estimate on when 3.4.1 will be 
>> released ? The xcode 5.1 issue is quite blocking for a lot of users.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Seb
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I think our new flow is that *anything* meant for end users should 
>>> go on dist/, and it's the other channels (npm) that are optional.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I expect that if it is going out to users it should have a vote.  
>>>> Since
>>> we
>>>> need to roll CLI to actually surface this to users, we can 
>>>> probably
>> vote
>>>> for both at that time.
>>>> 
>>>> -Michal
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Steven Gill 
>>>> <stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I think we can vote on it when we vote on the tools.
>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2014 4:43 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I assume this does not need a vote since it doesn't go in the 
>>>>>> dist
>>>>> folder,
>>>>>> and only downloaded by the CLI tool?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> iOS: Changes are in the 3.4.x branch, and 3.4.1 is tagged. 
>>>>>>> I'll
>> do
>>>> more
>>>>>>> testing over the weekend.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Shazron 
>>>>>>> <shazron@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Yeah lets do a 3.4.1 iOS, simpler for now until we figure

>>>>>>>> out
>> any
>>>> new
>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>> regarding independent releases.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Plan:
>>>>>>>> - branch off 3.4.0 release
>>>>>>>> - cherry-pick commits for template changes, script changes,
>>> callback
>>>>> id
>>>>>>>> change (to allow callback ids with periods in them)
>>>>>>>> - version it 3.4.1 in VERSION in this branch only
>>>>>>>> - version it 3.4.1 in CDVAvailability.h (copy back to 
>>>>>>>> master as
>>>> well).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Steven Gill <
>>>> stevengill97@gmail.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I don't have any problem with going the 3.4.1 route.
It 
>>>>>>>>> would
>> be
>>>>>> simpler
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> terms of docs + js.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Shazron, would that work for you?
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 28, 2014 8:27 AM, "Andrew Grieve" 
>>>>>>>>> <agrieve@chromium.org
>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> From what I understand of the changes, it should
work 
>>>>>>>>>> fine to
>>> do
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> 3.4.1
>>>>>>>>>> and just leave the JS as is.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Marcel Kinard <
>>>> cmarcelk@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> It feels like trying to tag only iOS as 3.5.0
before 
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> other
>>>>>>>>> platforms
>>>>>>>>>>> is going to create a mess when it comes time
to 
>>>>>>>>>>> release the
>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> platforms, especially if there are subsequent
changes 
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>> cordova-js
>>>>>>>>>> and/or
>>>>>>>>>>> cordova-ios. I don't like moving tags. So +1
to 
>>>>>>>>>>> Michal's
>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 27, 2014, at 9:56 PM, Michal Mocny <
>> mmocny@google.com
>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I even try to grok the other questions,
why 
>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>> we
>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> tag
>>>>>>>>>> iOS
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.4.1?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the long-term answer for doing away with
the
>> cadence
>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> version all the platforms separately, like how
we do 
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>> the
>>>>>> plugins
>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Steven Gill
<
>>>>>>>>> stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The best course of action for the future
is to set 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> build
>>>>>>>>> label in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cordovajs to be just the sha.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe in the future, the build label in cordova-js

>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>> floats
>>>>>>>>> separate
>>>>>>>>>>> from the versions of all the platforms. Yeah,
perhaps 
>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>> just
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> sha.
>>>>>>>>>>> Every git repo has its own master and own independent
>>>> versioning
>>>>>>>>>> sequence.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> That does beg the question if there is some kind
of 
>>>>>>>>>>> overall
>>>>>> snapshot
>>>>>>>>> id
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> replace the cadver, and when do we do Apache
releases 
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>> dist.
>> 

Mime
View raw message