Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D299F1030B for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58934 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2014 20:08:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 58895 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2014 20:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 58886 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2014 20:08:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:08:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.171] (HELO mail-ve0-f171.google.com) (209.85.128.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 20:08:32 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id jy13so1619383veb.30 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:08:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fvBK7mv+KYr6HPiWPoFiocbGSB81EA55z3B7/8aG52g=; b=ftBKDlMDnqgJ8k3R7BQ6MbJh1RB9IQ82ppB/lCXBc++A6khq5ISxDkGnbFeaYFGsMQ A+czx8lQHCk80g4gp5OrenNexFqaQDrxclou+Dn9aFkxRo23+kMbGC1/1Pj6afq9tEdI EQTbz4GrYSYCu3Yso3UdBlG8HSSAmSguX1u+VF+mFQQ4M4SkKP6luJjjx1qzqgBq/iNx PEQde7E5HX743AQX+KDhf8CdGZX2LzQSskTIxbKv+Mk8F6+y0bIeBTgbUuBkaSvAnVmK ovqX2g8szgaY4BtvGFFEqU514oQEopVqOM4bpjyTzmhM2DHhgFeXZPzmMNGlxb+LvWwP bpTA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.165.105 with SMTP id yx9mr2623874vdb.22.1395950891470; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.241.208 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:08:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:08:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.5.0 From: Joe Bowser To: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Since we haven't decided on whether to break out platforms, we should probably attempt to continue with the release cadence. How urgent is the iOS update? Could it be a 3.4.x release on its own? On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote: > I don't think I'll have time before ApacheCon to help with this. Would be > happy if it happened, but can't contribute myself. Things should clear up > for me post ApacheCon though, and I'll start getting back at things. > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Shazron wrote: > >> Should we start this now? On iOS it's painful for regular devs who need to >> keep patching things. We should get it out at least before ApacheCon I >> hope. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Andrew Grieve >> wrote: >> >> > That's all it does right now, but I always figured we could use it to >> patch >> > other things that aren't so hard to do. >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Shazron wrote: >> > >> > > I'm all for 3.5.0 release. >> > > Andrew - I've always thought the update script just updates the >> > CordovaLib? >> > > I doubt it will actually patch the main projectfile for the >> Architecture >> > > settings (although we could do that I suppose) >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> > > >> > > > I think the platforms separation might have to come w/ andrew's other >> > > > proposal. (Or at least more discussion about how seperating >> versioning >> > of >> > > > platforms will impact cli/plugman code.) >> > > > >> > > > I'm always a +1 for releasing. Ideally we exercise these new steps >> more >> > > > often so the whole thing becomes a total non event. As it should be. >> > > > >> > > > Fun fact, we shipped 67 releases of the phonegap distribution last >> > year. >> > > No >> > > > surprise we are not on track to match this year. (Yet.) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Andrew Grieve > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > The main reason would be for iOS Xcode 5.1 support. Probably we'd >> > want >> > > to >> > > > > have the update project settings modified via the update script >> (not >> > > sure >> > > > > if that's been handled yet). >> > > > > >> > > > > I don't think we need to wait for a split-up-the-platform-release >> > > > proposal, >> > > > > or else risk delaying too long. >> > > > > >> > > > > I do think someone needs to do a one-over of our release process >> > though >> > > > now >> > > > > that we're using dist/ & votes more properly. >> > > > > >> > > > > I've finished moving the docs from the wiki to: >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/cadence-release-process.md >> > > > > , >> > > > > So you can use the github editor to create pull requests to it :) >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Joe Bowser >> > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > NOT IT! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I would hold off 3.5 before we decide what we're doing with >> > > platforms. >> > > > > > I don't feel Android needs a new release yet, but I've been >> > working >> > > > > > on an experimental branch for a bit, so I'm not 100% sure. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Michal Mocny < >> mmocny@chromium.org >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > Feels like we just released 3.4! >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We discussed this at the Hangout: Lets split out the platforms, >> > and >> > > > > > remove >> > > > > > > Release Notes from the dist artifact, so as to make the dist/ >> > > > artifacts >> > > > > > > easier to release/test. Also makes it easier to have different >> > > > > > individual >> > > > > > > responsible for each platform. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > (We also discussed moving to semver and potentially shipping >> > > weekly / >> > > > > > > independently of each other -- but I think we should leave that >> > for >> > > > > > future >> > > > > > > releases.) >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Finally, we also discussed starting to use release managers. >> NOT >> > > IT! >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -Michal >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Steven Gill < >> > > stevengill97@gmail.com >> > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> How are people feeling about doing a 3.5.0 release soon? >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>