Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mmocny@google.com designates
 209.85.128.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mmocny@google.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMSbhBhuk8Z-NXLUbOCw8PiuziPcAk2j=Uj=OfHn83bFAe+mfg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMSbhBjA6pBc-EpTmT6hWN824yJ+--BMQkyQf-Qt2q9T3asBFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEeF2TeRt1rKFRwbcF3xEFPge-=doksPE_CZGMhS5gz6edSycg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOBL_k5jNJOMJM_mXbw=bpxrHf6pgpbck0VRmC0KP4A_ASiSYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1XaTLMyxDcNjhbscs0xDgm3_eNUUDk1NK5MtxWqF+vnwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADVgkyO2drMahY+DvZES2wGDKbm6PrMqV2PTFN0wcvaaasVyog@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZUa22uHihgkTpsoQGS9b6sFShEaNJHBFceyooEpXfqkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1XJVPe20era6z2mhFQmwEDMHpRbOO7K2YnPg=kaYurqNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZWoN1mEkdmJ9SzTA2qfPJdbN74+8jxBp9b4SFti194Dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1V_G5qM62zL0uNViudwzMnB7Fk2DEU0+jv+QhOzvrGn6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOBL_k7N_c_rk1-8arRVCTGGP6kzMrmBzYz8FO0o9BsJmSyQJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZRhjqAeqxvtSvitS-ZPvkrjSWyKfKUp8et=EVP1tEAOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBh2wZZkN+EedFESFXS+hpdXDQGxPnD3nDx2WK9KmwH+kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEeF2TdMu1weac5aYgGSyk1-Km6dMiVRQhDuXbc=h2TBgw6i6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <49D7136A-17DB-4C18-B32E-B7514ED5850A@gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1VTfUXzNxNEr+kGHLTAcJaNwBH+rYRH9rCjQD0WWtQqRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBjHZfdK6OaEKtmVMMTW9xMXXKr2GCUAaEHSNW4sTgX9uw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-b=Pipk0VxPqpz7WW5JS4_1ztcagkZGhU=fWohHtx22ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-avCd3CLMwrVF+0gGauBka7vAShotzgWn=wZfmQc10QoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-YHE6R8=sDfBTDjR=T7Ut7vV0EUbUrr3_L_6q2WZ7uqqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBhuk8Z-NXLUbOCw8PiuziPcAk2j=Uj=OfHn83bFAe+mfg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 00:38:36 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAEeF2Tc-zY4N0u9N28T_HHXg+QcwKiOU8tcJhAQqz-uSYetePw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.5.0
To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3435c070cbc804f5b76546

--047d7b3435c070cbc804f5b76546
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I expect that if it is going out to users it should have a vote.  Since we
need to roll CLI to actually surface this to users, we can probably vote
for both at that time.

-Michal


On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think we can vote on it when we vote on the tools.
> On Mar 28, 2014 4:43 PM, "Shazron" <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I assume this does not need a vote since it doesn't go in the dist
> folder,
> > and only downloaded by the CLI tool?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > iOS: Changes are in the 3.4.x branch, and 3.4.1 is tagged. I'll do more
> > > testing over the weekend.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Yeah lets do a 3.4.1 iOS, simpler for now until we figure out any new
> > way
> > >> regarding independent releases.
> > >>
> > >> Plan:
> > >> - branch off 3.4.0 release
> > >> - cherry-pick commits for template changes, script changes, callback
> id
> > >> change (to allow callback ids with periods in them)
> > >> - version it 3.4.1 in VERSION in this branch only
> > >> - version it 3.4.1 in CDVAvailability.h (copy back to master as well).
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I don't have any problem with going the 3.4.1 route. It would be
> > simpler
> > >>> in
> > >>> terms of docs + js.
> > >>>
> > >>> Shazron, would that work for you?
> > >>> On Mar 28, 2014 8:27 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > From what I understand of the changes, it should work fine to do a
> > >>> 3.4.1
> > >>> > and just leave the JS as is.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > It feels like trying to tag only iOS as 3.5.0 before the other
> > >>> platforms
> > >>> > > is going to create a mess when it comes time to release the other
> > >>> > > platforms, especially if there are subsequent changes to
> cordova-js
> > >>> > and/or
> > >>> > > cordova-ios. I don't like moving tags. So +1 to Michal's
> question.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Mar 27, 2014, at 9:56 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@google.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > Before I even try to grok the other questions, why can't we
> just
> > >>> tag
> > >>> > iOS
> > >>> > > as
> > >>> > > > 3.4.1?
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Perhaps the long-term answer for doing away with the cadence
> > release
> > >>> is
> > >>> > to
> > >>> > > version all the platforms separately, like how we do for the
> > plugins
> > >>> now.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Steven Gill <
> > >>> stevengill97@gmail.com>
> > >>> > > wrote:
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >> The best course of action for the future is to set the build
> > >>> label in
> > >>> > > >> cordovajs to be just the sha.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Maybe in the future, the build label in cordova-js also floats
> > >>> separate
> > >>> > > from the versions of all the platforms. Yeah, perhaps it's just
> the
> > >>> sha.
> > >>> > > Every git repo has its own master and own independent versioning
> > >>> > sequence.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > That does beg the question if there is some kind of overall
> > snapshot
> > >>> id
> > >>> > to
> > >>> > > replace the cadver, and when do we do Apache releases to dist.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

--047d7b3435c070cbc804f5b76546--