Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0CB510646 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7751 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2014 21:06:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 7661 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2014 21:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 7317 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2014 21:06:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:06:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.41] (HELO mail-qa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:05:56 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j5so1668681qaq.0 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:05:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=yDMk/m+vrffQ/I3DLacA2lbt5bO/2RnEDEgYpTf40rQ=; b=YkeeirL0GBjZE1mhIerkAOSEehA5V8Hs4YVu8oDXu5iLCk4a+7QQRibk8BQqkS1wCq pTsjGbJStbnKEl1Ofn3j4RkrYglsjL4gPq/vrSWWbjHY9zyLewFpNhyOmdzv4dxcf4hV dbb9Z0xy0gVNZHmpBcnF4IZkWuzEa8gmqVYyjzX4pbXMYITt/wK/d4a2iBSFGTyM05kb ft4c4Gpz4SbrDWquF/hlcnRpuUAypb+NX2VRQgJI3DNw2bv82Q001mIUYY29ok5C9Sfq JdKf9VTc5Y+fXIJuhVemqjs+mYze+hlurxDtEJ1Mrf7C5s4R4ZGghsYiUJYYMn0Ym397 Cveg== X-Received: by 10.224.171.200 with SMTP id i8mr5293684qaz.96.1394744735662; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:05:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.101.7 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:04:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Shazron Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:04:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.5.0 To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2ca88858a7d04f48350a2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2ca88858a7d04f48350a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm all for 3.5.0 release. Andrew - I've always thought the update script just updates the CordovaLib? I doubt it will actually patch the main projectfile for the Architecture settings (although we could do that I suppose) On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > I think the platforms separation might have to come w/ andrew's other > proposal. (Or at least more discussion about how seperating versioning of > platforms will impact cli/plugman code.) > > I'm always a +1 for releasing. Ideally we exercise these new steps more > often so the whole thing becomes a total non event. As it should be. > > Fun fact, we shipped 67 releases of the phonegap distribution last year. No > surprise we are not on track to match this year. (Yet.) > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Andrew Grieve > wrote: > > > The main reason would be for iOS Xcode 5.1 support. Probably we'd want to > > have the update project settings modified via the update script (not sure > > if that's been handled yet). > > > > I don't think we need to wait for a split-up-the-platform-release > proposal, > > or else risk delaying too long. > > > > I do think someone needs to do a one-over of our release process though > now > > that we're using dist/ & votes more properly. > > > > I've finished moving the docs from the wiki to: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/cadence-release-process.md > > , > > So you can use the github editor to create pull requests to it :) > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > > > > NOT IT! > > > > > > I would hold off 3.5 before we decide what we're doing with platforms. > > > I don't feel Android needs a new release yet, but I've been working > > > on an experimental branch for a bit, so I'm not 100% sure. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Michal Mocny > > wrote: > > > > Feels like we just released 3.4! > > > > > > > > We discussed this at the Hangout: Lets split out the platforms, and > > > remove > > > > Release Notes from the dist artifact, so as to make the dist/ > artifacts > > > > easier to release/test. Also makes it easier to have different > > > individual > > > > responsible for each platform. > > > > > > > > (We also discussed moving to semver and potentially shipping weekly / > > > > independently of each other -- but I think we should leave that for > > > future > > > > releases.) > > > > > > > > Finally, we also discussed starting to use release managers. NOT IT! > > > > > > > > -Michal > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Steven Gill > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> How are people feeling about doing a 3.5.0 release soon? > > > >> > > > > > > --001a11c2ca88858a7d04f48350a2--