Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOBL_k7N_c_rk1-8arRVCTGGP6kzMrmBzYz8FO0o9BsJmSyQJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMSbhBjA6pBc-EpTmT6hWN824yJ+--BMQkyQf-Qt2q9T3asBFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEeF2TeRt1rKFRwbcF3xEFPge-=doksPE_CZGMhS5gz6edSycg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOBL_k5jNJOMJM_mXbw=bpxrHf6pgpbck0VRmC0KP4A_ASiSYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1XaTLMyxDcNjhbscs0xDgm3_eNUUDk1NK5MtxWqF+vnwg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADVgkyO2drMahY+DvZES2wGDKbm6PrMqV2PTFN0wcvaaasVyog@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZUa22uHihgkTpsoQGS9b6sFShEaNJHBFceyooEpXfqkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1XJVPe20era6z2mhFQmwEDMHpRbOO7K2YnPg=kaYurqNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZWoN1mEkdmJ9SzTA2qfPJdbN74+8jxBp9b4SFti194Dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1V_G5qM62zL0uNViudwzMnB7Fk2DEU0+jv+QhOzvrGn6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOBL_k7N_c_rk1-8arRVCTGGP6kzMrmBzYz8FO0o9BsJmSyQJA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:30:46 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAE6O_-ZRhjqAeqxvtSvitS-ZPvkrjSWyKfKUp8et=EVP1tEAOw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.5.0
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf160802b9e3b04f59c78ab

--047d7bf160802b9e3b04f59c78ab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Urgent as in -- ppl using Xcode 5.1 can't compile without mucking about a
lot in project settings, and I mean a lot of settings. And even then they
might not get it right. But the more urgent issue is, on 64-bit platforms,
the current iOS code will crash because of the requirement of explicit
casting of their low-level message sending functions.


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

> Since we haven't decided on whether to break out platforms, we should
> probably attempt to continue with the release cadence.  How urgent is
> the iOS update? Could it be a 3.4.x release on its own?
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@google.com>
> wrote:
> > I don't think I'll have time before ApacheCon to help with this. Would be
> > happy if it happened, but can't contribute myself. Things should clear up
> > for me post ApacheCon though, and I'll start getting back at things.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Should we start this now? On iOS it's painful for regular devs who need
> to
> >> keep patching things. We should get it out at least before ApacheCon I
> >> hope.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > That's all it does right now, but I always figured we could use it to
> >> patch
> >> > other things that aren't so hard to do.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I'm all for 3.5.0 release.
> >> > > Andrew - I've always thought the update script just updates the
> >> > CordovaLib?
> >> > > I doubt it will actually patch the main projectfile for the
> >> Architecture
> >> > > settings (although we could do that I suppose)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Brian LeRoux <b@brian.io> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I think the platforms separation might have to come w/ andrew's
> other
> >> > > > proposal. (Or at least more discussion about how seperating
> >> versioning
> >> > of
> >> > > > platforms will impact cli/plugman code.)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm always a +1 for releasing. Ideally we exercise these new steps
> >> more
> >> > > > often so the whole thing becomes a total non event. As it should
> be.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Fun fact, we shipped 67 releases of the phonegap distribution last
> >> > year.
> >> > > No
> >> > > > surprise we are not on track to match this year. (Yet.)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Andrew Grieve <
> agrieve@chromium.org
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > The main reason would be for iOS Xcode 5.1 support. Probably
> we'd
> >> > want
> >> > > to
> >> > > > > have the update project settings modified via the update script
> >> (not
> >> > > sure
> >> > > > > if that's been handled yet).
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I don't think we need to wait for a
> split-up-the-platform-release
> >> > > > proposal,
> >> > > > > or else risk delaying too long.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I do think someone needs to do a one-over of our release process
> >> > though
> >> > > > now
> >> > > > > that we're using dist/ & votes more properly.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I've finished moving the docs from the wiki to:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/cadence-release-process.md
> >> > > > > ,
> >> > > > > So you can use the github editor to create pull requests to it
> :)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > NOT IT!
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I would hold off 3.5 before we decide what we're doing with
> >> > > platforms.
> >> > > > > >  I don't feel Android needs a new release yet, but I've been
> >> > working
> >> > > > > > on an experimental branch for a bit, so I'm not 100% sure.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Michal Mocny <
> >> mmocny@chromium.org
> >> > >
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > Feels like we just released 3.4!
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > We discussed this at the Hangout: Lets split out the
> platforms,
> >> > and
> >> > > > > > remove
> >> > > > > > > Release Notes from the dist artifact, so as to make the
> dist/
> >> > > > artifacts
> >> > > > > > > easier to release/test.  Also makes it easier to have
> different
> >> > > > > > individual
> >> > > > > > > responsible for each platform.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > (We also discussed moving to semver and potentially shipping
> >> > > weekly /
> >> > > > > > > independently of each other -- but I think we should leave
> that
> >> > for
> >> > > > > > future
> >> > > > > > > releases.)
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Finally, we also discussed starting to use release managers.
> >>  NOT
> >> > > IT!
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > -Michal
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Steven Gill <
> >> > > stevengill97@gmail.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> How are people feeling about doing a 3.5.0 release soon?
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

--047d7bf160802b9e3b04f59c78ab--