cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Parashuram Narasimhan (MS OPEN TECH)" <panar...@microsoft.com>
Subject RE: Release Managers
Date Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:52:29 GMT
Is there a place where the volunteers and noted with possible release schedules? Or do we just
volunteer for the upcoming release and get picked at random?  

-----Original Message-----
From: Lorin Beer [mailto:lorin.beer.dev@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 9:44 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Release Managers

+1 + i


On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Ian Clelland <iclelland@chromium.org>wrote:

> +1, this is a good idea.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1, like the idea of putting your name into a hat.
> >
> > How about "coaching" the first time someone does a release?  Do we 
> > prefer to let the docs stand for themselves?
> >
>
> Coaching is definitely a good idea as well; or something like it. 
> However, making sure that the docs are up to date and usable should be 
> an important part of being RM.
>
> It should't be an onerous thing -- just "if there's a step missing, or 
> something that wouldn't have worked, then fix the docs for the next guy".
>
> Ian
>
>
> >
> > -Michal
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Andrew Grieve 
> > <agrieve@chromium.org
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I'd previously brought up the idea of "Release Masters", and now 
> > > after
> > the
> > > recent highlight of our release process by other Apache project
> members,
> > > I've learned that they are common, and are actually called 
> > > "Release Managers".
> > >
> > > Their role, in a nutshell, is to take ownership of a release 
> > > (either through delegation, or by doing it themselves).
> > >
> > > It's generally not a glorious job, so it would be great if we 
> > > could do
> a
> > > bit of a rotation on it:
> > > - a rotation for tools,
> > > - a rotation for plugins,
> > > - a rotation for platforms release.
> > >
> > > For tools & plugins, the responsibility is a bit better defined I
> think -
> > > they are responsible for going through the steps in the release
> process.
> > >
> > > For platform releases, the release manager wouldn't necessarily be 
> > > responsible for individual platforms, but rather for things like 
> > > docs, website, dist/, and for poking people.
> > >
> > >
> > > As for a rotation, one thought is to write down the names of those
> > willing
> > > in the actual release steps .md files, and then they can plan out 
> > > how
> to
> > > schedule themselves from there.
> > >
> > > How does this sound?
> > >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message