cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.5.0
Date Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:20:35 GMT
I don't have any problem with going the 3.4.1 route. It would be simpler in
terms of docs + js.

Shazron, would that work for you?
On Mar 28, 2014 8:27 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:

> From what I understand of the changes, it should work fine to do a 3.4.1
> and just leave the JS as is.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It feels like trying to tag only iOS as 3.5.0 before the other platforms
> > is going to create a mess when it comes time to release the other
> > platforms, especially if there are subsequent changes to cordova-js
> and/or
> > cordova-ios. I don't like moving tags. So +1 to Michal's question.
> >
> > On Mar 27, 2014, at 9:56 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Before I even try to grok the other questions, why can't we just tag
> iOS
> > as
> > > 3.4.1?
> >
> > Perhaps the long-term answer for doing away with the cadence release is
> to
> > version all the platforms separately, like how we do for the plugins now.
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The best course of action for the future is to set the build label in
> > >> cordovajs to be just the sha.
> >
> > Maybe in the future, the build label in cordova-js also floats separate
> > from the versions of all the platforms. Yeah, perhaps it's just the sha.
> > Every git repo has its own master and own independent versioning
> sequence.
> >
> > That does beg the question if there is some kind of overall snapshot id
> to
> > replace the cadver, and when do we do Apache releases to dist.
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message