cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Publishing plugins in cordova-plugins
Date Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:48:07 GMT
I'll get the threads going


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:

> We discussed this at the Face to Face yesterday (maybe that prompted this
> mail?).
>
> I'm +1 for statusbar (as was everyone), but I'm -0 on keyboard (won't block
> it, but I don't like it), since its really buggy as-is, and its benefits
> come with real tradeoffs.  Additionally, I don't think is enough support
> for maintaining it from the core contributors at the moment (I may be
> wrong).
>
> Either way, lets spin up dedicated threads for these requests so we can
> discuss specifically.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:57 PM, luoq <luoq@polyvi.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I believe the statusbar & keyboard at least should be promoted to common
> > core plugins ASAP, it's a MUST for iOS7.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Qi LUO
> > Sent with Air
> >
> > On 5 March, 2014 at 5:45:18, Andrew (agrieve@chromium.org) wrote:
> >
> > statusbar and keyboard are published already.
> >
> > I *think* Shaz was having trouble updating them though? (and I think I
> > fixed the bug in plugman just yesterday).
> >
> > Noticed that they fail the whitelist check in plugman, so with a recent
> > version of plugman you wouldn't be able to publish them.
> >
> > And... Since these plugins are somewhat experimental and we're starting
> the
> > process of voting and publishing plugins to dist/, I wonder:
> >
> > a) Should we change the ID of these plugins to, say
> > "org.apache.cordova.labs"
> > b) Should we move these plugins to github and have them not under apache
> > for now, e.g.: com.shazron.statusbar
> > c) Should we just add them to the plugin release process.
> > d) Should we just never publish them to the registry and have people use
> > them via git url.
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
> > Current motive is that I would like file-system-roots to be published.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message