Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of iclelland@google.com designates
 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAE6O_-YowPno2v5_7=emDiUR_t=uuCQ7Ey7hEUynyqeMwnFY2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAE6O_-YDQqhm6AbsH=5Zpk4g2ZdSoeHOVi1ci40+6qiE5CUosg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK_TSX+NBY-49oYU=cpz67m1Kx3BP0viro0iS2C69OR7dprsBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEeF2Tc26NViJjf7exTb1DxjZYNfya0gP1t8hg7DUVvv68m9wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-YowPno2v5_7=emDiUR_t=uuCQ7Ey7hEUynyqeMwnFY2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ian Clelland <iclelland@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:05:41 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAK_TSXJpBAcqNHy5uLkkE11gwwdbm+bUVS6gAo9ZTyCDSGFatg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Improved integration between Apache and GitHub
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113685aef34d8604f33ef009

--001a113685aef34d8604f33ef009
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

> Something I noticed from a commit from Ian:
> https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/pull/20
>
> The github user "asfgit" automatically closed the PR from that commit -- I
> believe github scans the commit message to associate it with an issue/PR
> but not sure how it knows it was a merge. The relevant words in the message
> are "closes #20".
>

I was hoping that would happen when I wrote that commit line; I'll admit
that I didn't have very high hopes for it, though.


>
> Github has a way to refer to repos and issues, so this PR issue would be
> "apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer#20" so if we added to the commit
> message "Closes apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer#20" it should close the
> corresponding PR/issue (I hope).
>

Is the full repo name required? I thought that the example above shows that
it isn't, and we just need to ensure that we use one of the magic verbs and
mention the PR by number?


>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > This is a sweet improvement, but if I read correct, doesn't address our
> > biggest headaches:
> >
> > 1. You still cannot merge in PR from github
> > 2. We still cannot close PR ourselves
> > 3. Commits already automatically comment on corresponding JIRA issues, so
> > this change merely bumps the timing of automatic JIRA references to
> > comments up a bit (helps discoverability, but doesn't in the end help
> > manage JIRA issues all that much).
> >
> > Perhaps the most interesting change is the better discoverability of PR
> > from then dev ML without requiring explicit emails from the contributor,
> > and our ability to reply directly from ML.
> >
> > -Michal
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Ian Clelland <iclelland@chromium.org
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, and can we have a pony, too?
> > >
> > > Seriously, everything on that list is a huge improvement over the
> > > mostly-one-way-replication that we're working with now.
> > >
> > > Thanks for filing that.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
> > > >
> > > > Do we want everything on that list? I can file the issue...
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--001a113685aef34d8604f33ef009--