Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.181 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEeF2Tc26NViJjf7exTb1DxjZYNfya0gP1t8hg7DUVvv68m9wg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAE6O_-YDQqhm6AbsH=5Zpk4g2ZdSoeHOVi1ci40+6qiE5CUosg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK_TSX+NBY-49oYU=cpz67m1Kx3BP0viro0iS2C69OR7dprsBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEeF2Tc26NViJjf7exTb1DxjZYNfya0gP1t8hg7DUVvv68m9wg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shazron <shazron@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:54:33 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAE6O_-YowPno2v5_7=emDiUR_t=uuCQ7Ey7hEUynyqeMwnFY2w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Improved integration between Apache and GitHub
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113525023a4d2b04f33eca3c

--001a113525023a4d2b04f33eca3c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Something I noticed from a commit from Ian:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/pull/20

The github user "asfgit" automatically closed the PR from that commit -- I
believe github scans the commit message to associate it with an issue/PR
but not sure how it knows it was a merge. The relevant words in the message
are "closes #20".

Github has a way to refer to repos and issues, so this PR issue would be
"apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer#20" so if we added to the commit
message "Closes apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer#20" it should close the
corresponding PR/issue (I hope).


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@chromium.org> wrote:

> This is a sweet improvement, but if I read correct, doesn't address our
> biggest headaches:
>
> 1. You still cannot merge in PR from github
> 2. We still cannot close PR ourselves
> 3. Commits already automatically comment on corresponding JIRA issues, so
> this change merely bumps the timing of automatic JIRA references to
> comments up a bit (helps discoverability, but doesn't in the end help
> manage JIRA issues all that much).
>
> Perhaps the most interesting change is the better discoverability of PR
> from then dev ML without requiring explicit emails from the contributor,
> and our ability to reply directly from ML.
>
> -Michal
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Ian Clelland <iclelland@chromium.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Yes, and can we have a pony, too?
> >
> > Seriously, everything on that list is a huge improvement over the
> > mostly-one-way-replication that we're working with now.
> >
> > Thanks for filing that.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
> > >
> > > Do we want everything on that list? I can file the issue...
> > >
> >
>

--001a113525023a4d2b04f33eca3c--