Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63071108C6 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40258 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2014 15:00:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 39881 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2014 15:00:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 39873 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2014 15:00:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:00:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wjamesjong@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.177] (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com) (209.85.214.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:00:41 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wp18so4069950obc.22 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:00:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/uzagaAPADWG7tCthOVWo7s82BKCnjXNi77HYcPeZRM=; b=IE1xF1rut+bpgHRJg4EIWCWzIrWo4koLoc90K9HFEhlIet944vaeo6qpmQaeB6ifp/ 8dLXVGOuDVdf8D5rdBs3aOrHBKLOLYHoNa3PQjluGVWvdbS3LKsz7BeJ/ixx3ZPrQJl0 Ey8sqwJa0PMZCt0Ozq6g2uWaB0pbvjp/Tgy73huTB0alVuK4lLuvPfwci3OeEeSkIKG4 i7d7MlrO/kCiA9W/8bdAUFqNVnND9qcRfHShrn0UMF93RI5912gTe/t6NE/aWD8oExK5 llMn11AUmVbXdNJ/4KVgeWu+5OrOn7ylivj2pXjzpmdAKH0Ev0pZAhALsUELyivVM0XJ Mpvg== X-Received: by 10.182.92.231 with SMTP id cp7mr427799obb.82.1391785220026; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:00:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from jamess-mbp.raleigh.ibm.com (sinepix2gb.ny.us.ibm.com. [129.42.208.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm10962714obi.14.2014.02.07.07.00.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Feb 2014 07:00:19 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: Dropping iOS 5.0 support From: James Jong In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:00:18 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6086DEE8-8A46-443D-A0DE-F1818D7006C3@gmail.com> References: <20131220120027.6754455.16438.8146@blackberry.com> To: dev@cordova.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ally, Have you seen this (iOS 5 %) in your other apps as well? Or more so for = the new releases? -James Jong On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Ally Ogilvie wrote: > Bump. >=20 > Didn't see a solid statement here but... >=20 > As a developer for the commercial machine we launched a game in Asia = Q4 > 2013 and with a now sizeable amount of users: iOS 5.1 is 1% of total = users. >=20 > +1 drop support for version < 6.0. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Shazron wrote: >=20 >> I think that last paragraph is key - let's provide instructions in a = doc in >> cordova-ios/guides if they need this support. Not sure we need this = in >> cordova-docs >>=20 >>=20 >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Andrew Grieve >> wrote: >>=20 >>> I think we'd be fine to drop "official support" for iOS 5, but as = has >> been >>> pointed out, there's very little code-wise that would change. >>>=20 >>> If bug reports come that say "this function is being called and it >> doesn't >>> exist on iOS 5", then that's a trivial fix. Likely devs will just = fix it >>> themselves anyways. >>>=20 >>> If devs want to deploy for iOS 5, I think they'll be able to fiddle = with >>> their Xcode deployment target settings and do so fairly easily even = if we >>> "drop support for it". They are better at testing their own apps = anyways. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Josh Soref >> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Fwiw, If you have your installation media, getting 10.8/10.9 to = install >>> in >>>> the latest version of VirtualBox is trivial. I believe that the = same >>>> applies to 10.7, but I can't find my installation media :(. >>>> = --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain = confidential >>>> information, privileged material (including material protected by = the >>>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute >>> non-public >>>> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the >>> intended >>>> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in >> error, >>>> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information = from >>>> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of = this >>>> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be >>> unlawful. >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Ally Ogilvie > Lead Developer - MobDev. | Wizcorp Inc. > ------------------------------ > TECH . GAMING . OPEN-SOURCE WIZARDS+ 81 (0)3-4550-1448 | > Website > | Twitter | > Facebook > | LinkedIn