cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian LeRoux...@brian.io>
Subject Re: XML Namespaces
Date Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:26:15 GMT
this is at the project level (cli projects) not the platform level so I
think we're ok

that said, this whole discussion reeks of bikeshed


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:

> FYI. Windows Phone SDK and Windows 8 'native' .net SDKs do NOT provide a
> library to parse generic json objects, while reading XML is trivial.
> I could easily add the 6MB JSON.net [1] library to support this, but I have
> avoided every dependency I could in getting to this point, so I would
> rather not. I would likely have to write ~400 LOC to use the
> DataContractJsonSerializer to parse the file, which isn't a huge deal, but
> should be considered. I always strive to write as little code as possible.
>
> Please keep in mind the 'native' implications of making the move to .json
> only, and not just the convenience of inspecting, authoring, and modifying
> the config file.
>
>
>
> [1] http://james.newtonking.com/json
> [2]
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.runtime.serialization.json.datacontractjsonserializer(v=vs.110).aspx
>
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Josh Soref <jsoref@blackberry.com> wrote:
>
> > Jonathan wrote:
> > > It fits more naturally with some 'native' tools (e.g. android & windows
> > 8).
> > > IDE's have better support for it.
> >
> > This is changing
> >
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2014/02/06/json-debugger-visualizer-in-visual-studio-2013.aspx
> >
> > > If you're developing only with css,js,html -> json makes more sense
> >
> > > If you're developing using native tools (plugman flow) -> xml makes
> more
> > sense
> >
> > Tools evolve. I don't see this as a particularly strong argument.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message