Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cmarcelk@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.44 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: Camera does too many things!!!!
From: Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOe3-e6gA9mZmcN7Dd3G+1jyttjhECOGe4XLckX1fEfMH_9ZLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:42:12 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ACA5256C-4A08-401E-828C-87924EE5176E@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAOBL_k7z5v4pCdOXur_18G2O8R=Z0XYRR0bUpdN-LwbvOrCphw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1UVKASMZbOx5qQThK+g0TuYvjSMwwUVuKKTs4ROuf2-Zw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOBL_k4WTk+iAauwbmkdAK1iTdBjgWuEkFB7ZLYrBvWvqOvdBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOe3-e6gA9mZmcN7Dd3G+1jyttjhECOGe4XLckX1fEfMH_9ZLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@cordova.apache.org

What's going on in the standards bodies around image capture? Is there =
an emerging standard that we could scope down to, or is nothing emerging =
and we get to make it up in the meantime?

I do like the simplicity of the camera plugin (roughly) just doing =
capture, and pushing the utilities into a separate plugin (perhaps even =
non-core). I hear that picture capture and uploading is a common =
pattern, so we should consider the migration impact to existing users.

On Jan 24, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Mike Billau <mike.billau@gmail.com> wrote:

> How does this coincide with the recent thread about Camera vs Capture?

Yeah, seems like these are part of the same big picture that should be =
thought through simultaneously.