Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mike.billau@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOBL_k7h7uOcp0NZbK-QewpxqcH_DBDpGqC1TUWb+ru5xd_BnA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMSbhBjLoRPYuw+JSFekJtRcv+vGnC2twmdoO=DmmFb-YnW8pA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEeRA4oCrOoHXURYdb12fRSjZjHyM9_KQZvuAi2+yV7_hwcOJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMSbhBiQFtY5UQEN0z1cOQH_5=JXx4H0O+iu-R4zkxsR9npbaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE6O_-bhxyNY3XMuH4ibXZWNqQWWrnpnB=0mtd_gvpodu+Zr0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<914B1152-C4D2-4C06-911C-B5A92A9C9B17@gmail.com>
	<CAMSbhBjjoWgXdjDev33ZmYnLo_TFbkRBiHgJFaen7FLD8PCiLw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOe3-e7nMQqurq-uSx2fcr6JCdwiudr0bQNg3Jn6UDDk30sq_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B8ABE16-C91C-45AF-ACBE-63D3DC67FFE6@gmail.com>
	<CAOBL_k7h7uOcp0NZbK-QewpxqcH_DBDpGqC1TUWb+ru5xd_BnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:23:54 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAOe3-e7ZV=rxxgaJzxdkOi7KRm6ZMcNECHkbzh3eS3ZON+B24Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
From: Mike Billau <mike.billau@gmail.com>
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>, bowserj@apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0112d164c540b704ea899a2d

--089e0112d164c540b704ea899a2d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>> Remember, we're not testing the plugins, so that shouldn't block any
release.

+1, that any issues with plugins should not hold up the release.

However, I thought that with each cadence release we were going to publish
a list of the plugins that were tested with that release [1] -  a sort of
snapshot. We were going to at least list the commits on the blog post so it
is possible to consistently recreate a 3.2 timeframe project at a future
point. If we are still planning to do this than I think we need to run the
manual plugin tests.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/54crgxwa5anvva3o


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on 4.2.2
> on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
> >
> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> >         at
> org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
> >
>
> I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
> sometimes.  I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted because
> it's not the most reliable.
>
> > junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<pass> but was:<null>
> >         at
> org.apache.cordova.test.CordovaResourceApiTest.testWebViewRequestIntercept(CordovaResourceApiTest.java:258)
>
> I got two failures with the ResourceAPI the last time I tested it as
> well.  It'd be good if this test was looked into, since I'm afraid it
> might have gotten stale since it was written.
>
> >
> > I thought it was pretty cool that 100% of the automated tests in
> mobile-spec passed. An unbroken set of green dots ;-)
>
> I think it's cool as well.  I wonder if this would happen on Jasmine 2.
>
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Mike Billau <mike.billau@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I have been testing 3.2.0rc1 on Android 4.2.2 and 4.3 (hitting the 2.x
> >> devices tomorrow.
>

--089e0112d164c540b704ea899a2d--