Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stevengill97@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4C64A086-1A0A-4D07-AFBF-D8AD9653786D@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMk5LL=22s+iZjA7tV3Mn-LFsY3tg9yb=UUXJi2BkD-aHk3xng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBijJvDqrTwPp375VkDMB+33QoyPJk_j0tiRj479ArJLWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <D0018234-AE89-442E-9F38-5EB0989DE4DF@gmail.com>
 <4C64A086-1A0A-4D07-AFBF-D8AD9653786D@gmail.com>
From: Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:15:11 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAMSbhBgrB4YyvA3rFAicsnf81Syjh_8HiX49RUv1uOmuk8RHjw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tools release today?
To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11333590291e5704eaae5e81

--001a11333590291e5704eaae5e81
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

With 3.2 looming, it might be better to release plugman along with 3.2.
That way we don't tell our users to update now, and again when 3.2 comes
out. Unless of course the fix in plugman is critical.


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was reminded of
> http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/VersioningAndReleaseStrategy which says it
> is weekly, with cli and plugman together. Works for me.
>
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What is the trigger for doing a plugman release? As needed per
> bugs/features, or should it be at the same time as cli? I'd suggest the
> latter, since cli has either a pseudo-dependency or real dependency
> (depending on how you look at it) on plugman.
>
>

--001a11333590291e5704eaae5e81--