Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DC3410B84 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50460 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2013 22:23:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 50435 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2013 22:23:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 50427 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2013 22:23:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:23:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shazron@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:23:10 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q58so6746755wes.14 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:22:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=DGZDQ6vCcxCYprh79LjDPQYx2AEs03vxlm3Tx5uO+JY=; b=SXGcBBYtNb34ZrTDEpM5//HudbGHSZwGjCPIYC/blTnVb7Lqk5wVYCYp/nLN5mrb6H mxftQqkdiZwCoG0IAt+Bw8CqSTCe5AdXC9uM61Ti8mGYLevQmvWQAlQwdl6zj3AJ6Ct4 gal7OBTrawNegfSHte9zSrKsyVzQEbbIeUkQc2SXSwZ6dgl2l3XddibSj9uct/Qoycxz zaFdv+Gz3rfomR0Vo89rmZ6ZGaBs+r5dTNcRFvhSiR5J3Iw9CtCeJ/7TrvQ58zElTf7t tFvcwUyoDV8vi7d2eyFWZuavxVHpOx6at7sFN826SL1nMTGeaJl6zWJXhn8c2tcuvbHR v63A== X-Received: by 10.180.99.99 with SMTP id ep3mr18210744wib.11.1384294969956; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:22:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.201.69 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:22:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <914B1152-C4D2-4C06-911C-B5A92A9C9B17@gmail.com> <4B8ABE16-C91C-45AF-ACBE-63D3DC67FFE6@gmail.com> From: Shazron Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:22:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1 To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" Cc: "bowserj@apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044283c0f2e38404eb0249ff X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d044283c0f2e38404eb0249ff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Steve, you published the version as: 3.2.0-rc.1 so the correct line is: npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1 On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Steven Gill wrote: > Hey all, > > I am going to put up a blog post for review shortly for the RC. > > If you are interested in helping test the RC (DO IT), you can install it by > going npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc1. > > Let me know if their are any issues blocking the final release. I know that > the Firefox update script is not quite working, but this is a firefoxos > platform issue, not a cli one. I am working on it. :) > > Plugman 0.15.0 has also been published and set to latest. > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Steven Gill > wrote: > > > Update for everyone > > > > I chatted with the platform leads and we are hoping to tag 3.2.0rc1 > > tomorrow. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > >> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard > >> wrote: > >> >> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests on > >> 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1: > >> >> > >> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError > >> >> at > >> > org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63) > >> >> > >> > > >> > I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself > >> > sometimes. I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted because > >> > it's not the most reliable. > >> > > >> > >> Yup! The JS is broken on the tests, therefore this would break > >> window.location working! Please disregard this test until we've > >> upgraded the test project to be a proper 3.x set of tests. > >> > > > > > --f46d044283c0f2e38404eb0249ff--