Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F37C21089D for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86452 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2013 20:44:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 86430 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2013 20:44:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 86422 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2013 20:44:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:44:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of agrieve@google.com designates 209.85.192.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.179] (HELO mail-pd0-f179.google.com) (209.85.192.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:44:30 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r10so14268516pdi.24 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:44:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=AQRokJiUhgU3646gtvZl9i6HzuOs6IcuNw090EebVP4=; b=dUTVupQJq7PXMXylLDx7tSEwe5f9VAZDobJwBvA1LnGpcrpzOF8Yyew74tlqdHMRFj uILoDz5eFhZOK3G8EGPoB3vTyiUccyjpXiuZcOI/lrp8kNcQCNwjaUmGjz86GAMSiB+z QttEeBwd3st86YLQ6t9G5BHRsjpkMdXesg6NDBXeiD0BW9Bpb4yW3Nj28LxoOPTzgQ9A 7QmFyi/YqZQZgTx48Ka4jFwM0GywVpJHZTRkBNmmcJdWqudyLdaOPp8Ec5KFhRrV+IGt wR+oV6v8LRUw1ciH7cl3K/8Laz88eLE01gsA4bZZ19x61EWVnVkID8u5LWU1VLLT2tGY 3fPQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=AQRokJiUhgU3646gtvZl9i6HzuOs6IcuNw090EebVP4=; b=iuu2qM1fi8tCSN6yBbMI1hR3dYQSBT1L6XMZJXIPGeVMC0Gr/ModNkf8yqOyLjLZw6 PpqnrXFOeH6bduPfIPskVAhzqFabwpoEFa5lS9EnFGSToFxnNvKsli6Jgnd2aFfmBEXv 6jaU98qEP2j5uHvZfrVX0J+31ebUZsoR/FIYA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=AQRokJiUhgU3646gtvZl9i6HzuOs6IcuNw090EebVP4=; b=WYB3wNVQvDwx+70/LqMyOdtp9I6nIDvPhgGVNEh4/Ho/+p92/ziIpWTCxqMedQY/ob QiC6N8UaYFzRQA5AN0oap5uSxa3rNxNu70snuv3cazz0dpw7npn9Y1WoI4APsqo76xYo jVpGhw/dxBq2NMbiATWybI9atmj+Dsz7JbvlibiPKiRIwop5P8SRD+ZyfQ+w1U5+SZ/s A82Cq4G8YQT9tm/0nD5d7NPbp3SmyrloM3KplZKUD/HM/JcC6AHT6iIB8s/UrwZDMJO+ R0x683n09eI2reOA0bHFUv3zfXJs/ILmU5d/se2CWuzlaPqLLH4gQib3WWRcS095D82u Eb4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlY+zmPu34e3GQCKM6Af8TOfRmQnqA36VScYBfER0pPwN/0yy6v5pBoUxBRQ31Z+hcJrsSXdhYCEoRIahWTCulYqWyAPTwxzlL3U1/w183jAqaAD3tM4aiYy0MKZmzDO+7xYD+DVFhi2ighppysGRd7+M/+G3+oNKExPOtgNp8zs2POB7zx7iZl5ibItnC6c9LzQzndp0LshAN9ah4pOiy4hAPFXQ== X-Received: by 10.66.218.198 with SMTP id pi6mr54684552pac.107.1385757850334; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:44:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: agrieve@google.com Received: by 10.68.136.35 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:43:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Grieve Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:43:50 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qFVXBHKji4O9GpD4ngpVeQsn2As Message-ID: Subject: Re: iOS Camera asking for Location To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d3ebe6a123d04ec56e45c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b5d3ebe6a123d04ec56e45c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yep, makes sense. On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Tommy-Carlos Williams wrote: > IIRC, Camera used to NOT keep the location and other data, then that was > raised as an issue and it was added in=85 and now it=92s being ripped out= again? > > I agree with it being optional, but ripping it out again, not so much. > > +1 for > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4003?focusedCommentId=3D13694956= &page=3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#co= mment-13694956 > > > > On 30 Nov 2013, at 6:43 am, Michal Mocny wrote: > > > Ah, thats a good point (us canadians do forget!), we will make sure to > > factor that into silent consensus! (Land all the patches now, boys!) > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Shazron wrote: > > > >> I believe Lorin is working on it being a preference, with it turned of= f > by > >> default. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4003 > >> > >> Also FYI Adobe US ppl are away for the turkey long weekend, so respons= es > >> might be late > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Michal Mocny > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I agree, rip it out. I'd love to see a plugin for editing EXIF data > >> using > >>> this code as a starting point perhaps, but I can't see how what we ha= ve > >> now > >>> is a good default. > >>> > >>> -Michal > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Andrew Grieve > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On iOS, the Camera API has an undocumented feature where it injects > >> your > >>>> location into a photo's exif data. > >>>> > >>>> Although neat, I think this isn't desired in most cases and it cause= s > a > >>>> location permission dialog to appear. > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to delete this location logic. Any objections? > >>>> > >>> > >> > > --047d7b5d3ebe6a123d04ec56e45c--