cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.9.1 + 3.2.0rc1
Date Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:30:04 GMT
Shaz, you are correct!

semver wants you to do rc versions that way.

I meant to say npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:

> Steve, you published the version as: 3.2.0-rc.1
>
> so the correct line is:
> npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc.1
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I am going to put up a blog post for review shortly for the RC.
> >
> > If you are interested in helping test the RC (DO IT), you can install it
> by
> > going npm install -g cordova@3.2.0-rc1.
> >
> > Let me know if their are any issues blocking the final release. I know
> that
> > the Firefox update script is not quite working, but this is a firefoxos
> > platform issue, not a cli one. I am working on it. :)
> >
> > Plugman 0.15.0 has also been published and set to latest.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Update for everyone
> > >
> > > I chatted with the platform leads and we are hoping to tag 3.2.0rc1
> > > tomorrow.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> BTW, I also found a couple failures in the Android native tests
on
> > >> 4.2.2 on a Nexus 7 with 3.2.0-rc1:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> > >> >>         at
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.cordova.test.BackButtonMultiPageTest.testViaHref(BackButtonMultiPageTest.java:63)
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > I actually think it's the test. It passes when I run it by itself
> > >> > sometimes.  I'm thinking that this should probably be deleted
> because
> > >> > it's not the most reliable.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Yup! The JS is broken on the tests, therefore this would break
> > >> window.location working!  Please disregard this test until we've
> > >> upgraded the test project to be a proper 3.x set of tests.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message