Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-26889-apmail-cordova-dev-archive=cordova.apache.org@cordova.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A492107F6
	for <apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon,  7 Oct 2013 17:01:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 12909 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2013 17:01:06 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12853 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2013 17:01:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cordova.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cordova.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cordova.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cordova.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12843 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2013 17:01:03 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 17:01:03 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cmarcelk@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.180 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.223.180] (HELO mail-ie0-f180.google.com)
 (209.85.223.180)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 17:00:57 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id u16so16224418iet.39
        for <dev@cordova.apache.org>; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
        bh=9o9n3mfMp7z9fljoZLmKLinvMb+7J1ehkPHW4PWhnzg=;
        b=eDLoL+xWC/1zjIQ1sMdmX3YT2R9NnTSApjzp60QNGYPfcCAf9hXTB3h9zBspJ6/s/i
         ODnYhDQWtCmS7ez8IYIQ7XhmfdGEFTMUTLrjLBlnIxgvSBY01EKUW0nTQ9RcSXy1r104
         Jnn+j4tKpFftXEb73YVzDwG2ttBQWWkpGD3Zrah0UDzYiwNbxR50DAAhb5CIaiIS3Cm3
         cIwPGLiVC0Fgr8Xd/cC0BeTV+zQpDu6LVZNhL/UVpO7hIn0Y+rQ83IPWL4Dz/VcunOqn
         wqX6BL1QsiwellDnI/rdvQQjLvKjYy3dGTTeGBUJXb7+DWXSxz5+LRskwEiEjVj8Eg/V
         WP0g==
X-Received: by 10.50.178.234 with SMTP id db10mr17819117igc.35.1381165237232;
        Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from marcelk-macbook.raleigh.ibm.com ([129.33.49.237])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p7sm27686531iga.3.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: Tag 2.9.1
From: Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKP6k2sLGThYh5WVQg2ehxdWp3OUgb4v-jLQn2eV5Sq7oVvAHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:00:33 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E62E27D5-5AAE-4CE2-9FA7-089176F88208@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAKP6k2sLGThYh5WVQg2ehxdWp3OUgb4v-jLQn2eV5Sq7oVvAHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

This thread seems to have gone quiet without a consensus. Should there =
be additional 2.9.x releases going forward?

If so, how often? What kind of fixes should be backported? Include =
updated docs?

On Oct 1, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com> wrote:

> As soon as we are done with 3.1.0 it would be a good time to go back =
and
> back-fill for a 2,9,1 release.
>=20
> Who's with me?