Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stevengill97@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABiQX1Xmd7w95dNapRkMo6rtkYOCVNsW6DmK2Lg7ucSdB_rhzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <967FE4CB-8DDF-4EDD-8282-2D6B0333A005@gmail.com>
 <CE707E2F.176A5%jheifetz@rim.com>
 <CAOBL_k5RNQY51ZjtRauw0v=66xmN=9DX_dPz2Bcmnp=E7XkCkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-Zi8-3m8+FyawAehyoLs44R-6cO8hiKSRi_6-4ktBkkBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZALGQHZNsuxizW3C9F4bKODjPj4SeLkXeu6LTmj6q69Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBj3r6gE+a=T79=L3ar=F82iJpadN81wwDF8VFWJanfwyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <A99179A2-5A3F-4A60-9EE1-9AF94DAE687A@gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-YNCy0SfeJQ_nbirhEZMpP6t-BQc8QW4GxY+4yirT1qUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKP6k2twDiFwWdpXfw1zqjX1GtOo=JD=jJvs_gE4akMg00_ygQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-YYW7PJ4RDvhpWi-qLoSbU9tYZJW4vAwQV-DiCAy+kodw@mail.gmail.com>
 <506A6C8D-32A4-42C1-BF65-E87FFBBCAAE9@gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-bN2916fB+7L0dSidxE6VzASy+kaCWBFxZMDwYj3OaCuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBhKLMX_y0B1RdX6BdRke9786ZXc7KqSgR5Lew6e2YzhBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1Xmd7w95dNapRkMo6rtkYOCVNsW6DmK2Lg7ucSdB_rhzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:53:36 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAMSbhBibx-9W64=rA5tebnvOBXyt6Ah7krrb2=tgHLMRbkOtcw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tagging 3.1.0 today?
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc800a4cf51004e7b4fdab

--047d7bdc800a4cf51004e7b4fdab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

According to http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/VersioningAndReleaseStrategy,
it looks like we were leaning towards CadVer-SemVer for the CLI. I just
think it would be weird to only make it CadVer for this release and then
add on the SemVer part whenever we make little fixes for the weekly
release.


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > FFOS is tagged.
> >
> > Looks like windows platforms and blackberry have been tagged as well. I
> saw
> > the tags on the repos and went ahead and closed the issues. Let me know
> if
> > you guys didn't want those issues closed just yet.
> >
> > Only things remaining are retagging docs, tagging cli, tagging plugman,
> > uploading the release and posting the blog post.
> >
> > I merged in Jesse's windows 8 pull requests to cordova-3.1.x branches of
> > the CLI + Plugman locally on my machine. I am running into some errors
> when
> > adding windows8 as a platform. I will chat with Jesse and once that is
> > sorted, I will push the updates up to apache.
> >
> > With CLI and Plugman, do we want to increase the version from the RC? The
> > RC for CLI is 3.0.10 and for plugman is 0.12.0. I think it would make the
> > most sense to update those to 3.0.11 and 0.13.0 instead of retagging
> those
> > on npm. Thoughts?
> >
>
> Updating version makes sense to me. There is still some debate over what
> the CLI version should look like I think ("3.1.0" vs "3.1.0-0.1.0") I'd
> like the former
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Do you mind doing it? I think we've always deleted and re-tagged using
> > the
> > > same name
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Shaz, do you want to take care of that, or would you like me to?
> > > >
> > > > When doing a re-tag, do we do the sane thing (use a modified tag
> name)
> > or
> > > > the insane thing (reuse the same tag name)?
> > > >
> > > > Looks like you already put the change in both the en/edge and
> en/3.1.0
> > > > dirs. Nice.
> > > >
> > > > On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Added
> > > >
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova-docs/commit/d0fdfe5ato
> > > > > cordova-docs, needs a 3.1.0 re-tag.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--047d7bdc800a4cf51004e7b4fdab--