Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of agrieve@google.com designates
 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: agrieve@google.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMSbhBibx-9W64=rA5tebnvOBXyt6Ah7krrb2=tgHLMRbkOtcw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <967FE4CB-8DDF-4EDD-8282-2D6B0333A005@gmail.com>
 <CE707E2F.176A5%jheifetz@rim.com>
 <CAOBL_k5RNQY51ZjtRauw0v=66xmN=9DX_dPz2Bcmnp=E7XkCkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-Zi8-3m8+FyawAehyoLs44R-6cO8hiKSRi_6-4ktBkkBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-ZALGQHZNsuxizW3C9F4bKODjPj4SeLkXeu6LTmj6q69Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBj3r6gE+a=T79=L3ar=F82iJpadN81wwDF8VFWJanfwyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <A99179A2-5A3F-4A60-9EE1-9AF94DAE687A@gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-YNCy0SfeJQ_nbirhEZMpP6t-BQc8QW4GxY+4yirT1qUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKP6k2twDiFwWdpXfw1zqjX1GtOo=JD=jJvs_gE4akMg00_ygQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-YYW7PJ4RDvhpWi-qLoSbU9tYZJW4vAwQV-DiCAy+kodw@mail.gmail.com>
 <506A6C8D-32A4-42C1-BF65-E87FFBBCAAE9@gmail.com>
 <CAE6O_-bN2916fB+7L0dSidxE6VzASy+kaCWBFxZMDwYj3OaCuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBhKLMX_y0B1RdX6BdRke9786ZXc7KqSgR5Lew6e2YzhBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABiQX1Xmd7w95dNapRkMo6rtkYOCVNsW6DmK2Lg7ucSdB_rhzA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMSbhBibx-9W64=rA5tebnvOBXyt6Ah7krrb2=tgHLMRbkOtcw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 01:49:41 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CABiQX1Uk_Pe1j3YYQo-ycw_RpfPBx_T7Bur+Jvj=_f9_+tbaXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tagging 3.1.0 today?
To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86f8360cccf104e7b773d0

--047d7b86f8360cccf104e7b773d0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Jeff - is there a JIRA issue for the bug? Would be good to mark it as a
dependent of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4843.

Bryan - thanks for the write-up! I've updated the review request with your
blurb.

Steven - CadVer-SemVer sounds good.


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com> wrote:

> According to http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/VersioningAndReleaseStrategy,
> it looks like we were leaning towards CadVer-SemVer for the CLI. I just
> think it would be weird to only make it CadVer for this release and then
> add on the SemVer part whenever we make little fixes for the weekly
> release.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > FFOS is tagged.
> > >
> > > Looks like windows platforms and blackberry have been tagged as well. I
> > saw
> > > the tags on the repos and went ahead and closed the issues. Let me know
> > if
> > > you guys didn't want those issues closed just yet.
> > >
> > > Only things remaining are retagging docs, tagging cli, tagging plugman,
> > > uploading the release and posting the blog post.
> > >
> > > I merged in Jesse's windows 8 pull requests to cordova-3.1.x branches
> of
> > > the CLI + Plugman locally on my machine. I am running into some errors
> > when
> > > adding windows8 as a platform. I will chat with Jesse and once that is
> > > sorted, I will push the updates up to apache.
> > >
> > > With CLI and Plugman, do we want to increase the version from the RC?
> The
> > > RC for CLI is 3.0.10 and for plugman is 0.12.0. I think it would make
> the
> > > most sense to update those to 3.0.11 and 0.13.0 instead of retagging
> > those
> > > on npm. Thoughts?
> > >
> >
> > Updating version makes sense to me. There is still some debate over what
> > the CLI version should look like I think ("3.1.0" vs "3.1.0-0.1.0") I'd
> > like the former
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do you mind doing it? I think we've always deleted and re-tagged
> using
> > > the
> > > > same name
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Shaz, do you want to take care of that, or would you like me to?
> > > > >
> > > > > When doing a re-tag, do we do the sane thing (use a modified tag
> > name)
> > > or
> > > > > the insane thing (reuse the same tag name)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks like you already put the change in both the en/edge and
> > en/3.1.0
> > > > > dirs. Nice.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Added
> > > > >
> > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova-docs/commit/d0fdfe5ato
> > > > > > cordova-docs, needs a 3.1.0 re-tag.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--047d7b86f8360cccf104e7b773d0--