cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: Plugman Release
Date Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:12:01 GMT
I called it cordova-3.1.x because it's about the 3.1.x version of Cordova,
the CadVer, not the CLI's own version numbering. We can always make a new
branch and drop the old one, if we like.

Braden


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com> wrote:

> the branch for both CLI and Plugman is called cordova-3.1.x (don't know why
> we didn't call it 3.1.x instead)
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz <jheifetz@blackberry.com
> >wrote:
>
> > It seems as though there is no cordova-cli 3.1.x branch, does this mean
> we
> > always release off of master?
> >
> > There is a bug I found where element tree needs to be bumped to the same
> > version as plugman to support namespace xml elements and I'd like to know
> > where to push this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > On 13-10-01 12:17 PM, "Steven Gill" <stevengill97@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Firefoxos is broken on master after the refactor. It works fine on the
> > >cordova-3.1.x branch though.
> > >
> > >I am testing jesse's pull requests for CLI + plugman today for
> > >cordova-3.1.x branch. If they look good I will merge them in. We should
> > >release CLI + Plugman at the same time as 3.1.0. The release should be
> > >based off cordova-3.1.x branch and not master.
> > >On Oct 1, 2013 7:41 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Braden's out doing intern interviews yesterday & today, so it's
> unlikely
> > >> he'll see this email until tomorrow if not Thursday.
> > >>
> > >> We could still do a tools release, but just don't update the
> > >>platforms.js
> > >> file to point at 3.1.0. That said, I think I saw Firefox was broken on
> > >> HEAD? Think we'll want to fix that before doing so.
> > >>
> > >> In terms of testing the RC - as Steven said - using cordova@3.0.10
> > >>should
> > >> do the trick
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I have an open pull request I would like someone else to look at.
> [1]
> > >> > This addresses the issue that Carlos brought up during plugin remove
> > >>[2]
> > >> > It would be great if this could be part of the release, or at least
> > >>the
> > >> > commit cherry picked into it.
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> >   Jesse
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> > >> > https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-plugman/pull/2
> > >> > [2]
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4943
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > @purplecabbage
> > >> > risingj.com
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Steven Gill <
> stevengill97@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I believe Braden did the same type of release for plugman that
he
> > >>did
> > >> for
> > >> > > cordova cli. He updated both packages on npm but set the latest
> tag
> > >>to
> > >> > > point to the previous version until we were ready to do our full
> > >> release.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > If you install the CLI RC
> > >> > > sudo npm install -g cordova@3.0.10, you actually get version
> 0.12.0
> > >>of
> > >> > > plugman as a dependency.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I will wait for Braden to chime in. I figure the CLI and Plugman
> > >>should
> > >> > > both be released on the same day we release 3.1.0.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:39 PM, David Kemp <drkemp@google.com>
> > >>wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > +1  to a plugman npm release.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > David Kemp
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Steven Gill
> > >><stevengill97@gmail.com
> > >> >
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Anyone see any issue with me doing a npm plugman release
> today?
> > >> > Testing
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > > CLI RC is kind of weird when the plugman dependency
is
> > >> incompatible.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > -Steve
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> > information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> non-public
> > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
> intended
> > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
> unlawful.
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message