cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
Subject Re: Tagging 3.1.0 today?
Date Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:49:38 GMT
Tough call. I think there are pros/cons either way.


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com> wrote:

> I noticed that cordova-docs wasn't tagged or branched at the same time the
> platforms were branched into 3.1.x for rc1. This seems to leave open the
> possibility for docs from platforms/plugins master (post 3.1.0) to leak
> into the 3.1.0 docs. I realize that cordova-docs won't get branched because
> of its internal directory structure, but I'm wondering if in the future it
> would be wise to go ahead and do the equivalent of running "rake
> version[3.1.0]" at the time that the 3.1.x branch is created. Then during
> the rc period, docs would behave just like platforms where changes would
> need to be put on 2 branches [master and 3.1.x] / doc versions [edge and
> 3.1.x].
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:05 AM, Marcel Kinard <cmarcelk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I believe the docs are now done.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4962
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4963
> >
> > The only thing left to do is to change the pointer to use this new
> version.
> >
> > On Sep 30, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Marcel - one big thing that hasn't happened yet is docs.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message