Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABCE810F28 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31928 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2013 19:10:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 31896 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2013 19:10:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 31888 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2013 19:10:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:10:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.173] (HELO mail-vc0-f173.google.com) (209.85.220.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:10:02 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id if17so1164457vcb.4 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:09:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=gAP9hZNy9bKZLXAxHC47OiXuWSmTzR3F3AG7ITFk//o=; b=Fbhxql4tpPZM1bk/AuQKWiC5HC/739p4h0wGix7gv2GvtlAPaKhybqJQmxb3K9fQDT w4khs4jyNhCaa97kgjAd784dcARHGXMvsMgpNUwGWzKc7HybdvUC1leAzOhsTQ0SsUFN kCFlNmVYefwB6mEooLGOjCgx/khFLiLi1wCeboAlkQ1+4LwE04SHeoFZaJ+OQyd7oMrM 2hJfqNbMM6oT1KJbTfyLXfBNjIrJFndCf2MuSkRrHHXj+fM69VfKgcBxBa+NpoD2rqoD f2LjomUavxWVQUoJRSpfDh5IewbBSeJinoHWHC2fF765xzJm7TJTvEvXQ8/aF/gABRa1 smHA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.186.202 with SMTP id ct10mr2099787vcb.14.1380222581464; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.183.5 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: bowserj@apache.org Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:09:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: 2.9.0 Support From: Joe Bowser To: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hey What did we agree to for supporting the old 2.9.x branch? I'm just wondering, since we're still getting tons of bugs filed against that. While most of them are valid in 3.0.x, we probably should be backporting to 2.9. Have people been doing this. I've been doing this a bit, but I have to admit that I've been slipping up recently. What are people's thoughts on this? Joe