Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bowserj@gmail.com designates
 209.85.220.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: bowserj@apache.org
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAEeF2TfVkKZFBqymV6ULjd8SD7shwA5WsNqq9hyeXcuX-d0o6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAEeF2TfVkKZFBqymV6ULjd8SD7shwA5WsNqq9hyeXcuX-d0o6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:17:28 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOBL_k5On12oBHX46th_gxaNz-ucSve==7W_z-wVNwna9Kj3Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rumour mill: is apache-github integration going to improve?
From: Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com>
To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Based on what I know about The Apache Way, direct hosting on GitHub
will never happen.  "BTW, Whenever there is something that I don't
like about the way we have to do things, I blame the Apache Way for
it."

I would love if there was better mirroring for pull requests from
GitHub.  That being said, I have no problem downloading patches and
running git am on them, since I like that workflow a bit better since
it shows who vetted the commit.

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Michal Mocny <mmocny@google.com> wrote:
> I heard somewhere, can't remember from who, that its possible apache repos
> in the future will be hosted directly on github (or maybe just that
> mirroring will happen without noticeable delay and in both directions?),
> and so we can move to actually accepting pull requests from github.
>
> Is that true?  Is that potentially happening?
>
> I ask because that may impact our decision to jump onto the
> reviews.apache.org bandwagon.  I'd say its not worth learning to use if the
> timeline for github is short (though that seems unlikely).
>
> -Michal