Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31D9810832 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34232 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2013 18:28:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 34150 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2013 18:28:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 34129 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2013 18:28:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:28:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of iclelland@google.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.176] (HELO mail-ob0-f176.google.com) (209.85.214.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:28:06 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id uy5so3462422obc.35 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:27:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=wFgucrHUp8Jc3jgRaXoZVBoyqLEZpS8r24zx/pjs7rk=; b=FahH85rg0MK7Cy/9EpCRCI6759+h62mVjo005fnKBtOuf4w4yUYFik/0Kxji6uDzYS z3epumTH3E4RzaO3NkW8Mf1TEOT1SRUGjWHC/FuXAZay9xB4GMhAxNzCQ6ecdQplmKIn l0PeCUyIQTw14CFh/gVHgmngC8bJ0A14Z1W9bWKtAlHiLSPraFDyYdWRqVskGojaVFir 8LQxRrUEryvtffMZ2O1KgMj9IjFgMIC4J4tp70PFzteZJ3pOlWrtMkNrC/5q56pvM1d7 CbmCfZNND0VG1LtmHVGdhB7vjx8MKIK/UxEdtyWoPZr1Ih2TpZ4SZWjwkZfzEOW88/Ww vnlg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=wFgucrHUp8Jc3jgRaXoZVBoyqLEZpS8r24zx/pjs7rk=; b=aVD6MFdwn+k+MZgK09DMZtiLwtcTE+qj/MveULzSGWJyoJOymw7FahfhXleh7nAh+j MQZgBiSejByDbTuu1ZBf+wnKzZY2znt6QJxlu7KVWDc2aAAUML197dLQy60JeoHNuyS2 DeHxwH3l7Svh1ZbLtjyl57EC9TjybkoECbdmc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=wFgucrHUp8Jc3jgRaXoZVBoyqLEZpS8r24zx/pjs7rk=; b=MN+/0jlvj0qruVkJB+I77ItCjYIW9iuhGSCQV+1cBmCL5ExwJfqHbnnpNTIxIMOjYA CX3YTIJPg40TkhAfVU7N2iayVWmtuC9KAqtE3cZ3i/xQfL/BHDD4k5/S3Nw6AnKw7K0G 3ExD5FC6cjMr1+l+mRfaR4dnxUy9/VRwxiQsbGHIVepIQsKYg9kT0RjXzjrP31S4G9BK qucYc7UJGaBtEvhlnH2LD/RodkRZUCb9KBqCSnWMDBDIR8FKa8N5RXx1LIJqHAjhZ7QQ CbWQq9jQDDAgne3OnX9RYa/7zuzz5uZmHg0FeiLFm+rgjJxO7jb1BqaGmU2v/jLn22Hn SYjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnuqjGNEB3Gd7F5I+Wt4I1OjeGE7jFeHsL8qtEjrvZtiFN8zxUmUFs+zpH3SeWfm7ovIPrFSRVWWqHLI2Hj87n7SW5m2+/bfGB7K2nCz6UqcraOPzsOPNjswVCfx0A5cIMnbujKmH3tkFyrwI/eyD9a2IV4UeIVzNK+yn1xPBthDBm8uPUTCxemvXObHKCMqxnLXsycquLyuOEf2Amdlvyv+2hdxg== X-Received: by 10.182.181.34 with SMTP id dt2mr6863543obc.30.1380306465550; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:27:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: iclelland@google.com Received: by 10.182.102.73 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:27:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ian Clelland Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 20:27:25 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: D8Gy92_jk4tn7_9cXR4Xp8Z1fUY Message-ID: Subject: Re: 2.9.0 Support To: "dev@cordova.apache.org" , bowserj@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122aa248f878d04e761a45d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0122aa248f878d04e761a45d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > > So, are we going to do a 2.9.1? Should I be going through all the > plugins and making sure that everything is backported? > I like the idea of releasing 2.9.1 close to Cordova 3.1 -- could we continue with that up to 2.9.5 with Cordova 3.5? (Cadence-release, of course :) ) --089e0122aa248f878d04e761a45d--