cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeffrey Heifetz <jheif...@blackberry.com>
Subject Re: 3.1 Release
Date Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:52:36 GMT
I can take the responsibility of tagging BlackBerry. Could you send me the wiki with instructions
?

From: Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org<mailto:agrieve@chromium.org>>
Date: Thursday, 19 September, 2013 10:40 AM
To: dev <dev@cordova.apache.org<mailto:dev@cordova.apache.org>>, Jeffrey Heifetz
<jheifetz@blackberry.com<mailto:jheifetz@blackberry.com>>
Subject: Re: 3.1 Release

+Jeffrey - maybe you could take on the BlackBerry component for this release?


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brooks <michael@michaelbrooks.ca<mailto:michael@michaelbrooks.ca>>
wrote:
Once the platforms are tagged, I can handle the docs. I'll need to review
our release process and see how the docs can best abide by them.


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org<mailto:agrieve@chromium.org>>
wrote:

> Shaz - Thanks for the update :). If iOS is the last one then I'd say let's
> go without, but maybe keep at it until we get BB tagged? (just my opinion)
>
> Heading home now - anyone know if Lorin is away or not?
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com<mailto:shazron@gmail.com>>
wrote:
>
> > When i mean ios-deploy still works, it _installs_ it on the device, but
> > does _not_ run it.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com<mailto:shazron@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> >
> >> I'm 99% done with iOS specific fixes. One last one I'm trying to do is
> >> ios-deploy with lldb: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4804
> >>
> >> This means if I don't get this fix in, we _can_ deploy from the command
> >> line using ios-deploy _but_ we can't attach to the debugger. Will that
> be
> >> acceptable you think?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org<mailto:agrieve@chromium.org>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ping Lorin & Shaz.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com<mailto:stevengill97@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> FFOS will be tagged tomorrow. I have a few changes I am going to get
> in
> >>>> tomorrow before tagging but it will be good to go very soon!
> >>>>
> >>>> With FFOS, Only two plugins have been ported so far (vibration and
> >>>> device).
> >>>> We are going to continue to add firefoxos support to plugins post
> >>>> release.
> >>>> I don't think we should start officially promoting support for FFOS
> >>>> until
> >>>> we have more plugins. For 3.1, it will be available for users to try
> >>>> out,
> >>>> test, give feedback, etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> -Steve
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org<mailto:agrieve@chromium.org>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Thanks Jesse! Great work on being on top of things. If changes
were
> >>>> done in
> >>>> > plugin repos, then those aren't a part of this release anyways
and
> >>>> will be
> >>>> > picked up by the RELEASENOTES.md within the plugin repos on the
next
> >>>> > plugins release.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I think it's up to you if you want to start writing RELEASENOTES.md
> >>>> for
> >>>> > WP7+8. My thinking was just that doing so would make release
> >>>> announcements
> >>>> > easier.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Since WP7 and WP8 are in the same repo, does it make sense to have
> >>>> > different subtasks for their taggings? If so, I'll add it to the
> >>>> template,
> >>>> > if not, maybe I'll just change WP8 to say WP7+WP8? WDYT?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Shaz - I see you're still checking in iOS7 fixes. Do you think
> you'll
> >>>> be
> >>>> > able to tag iOS / OSX soon?
> >>>> > Lorin - Same question for BB. Will you be able to write an update
> >>>> script
> >>>> > for it (CB-4776)
> >>>> > Steve - Likewise for FF
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I'd really like this tagging to be done tomorrow so that we can
test
> >>>> out
> >>>> > RC1 using RC1 of CLI.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Jesse <purplecabbage@gmail.com<mailto:purplecabbage@gmail.com>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > WP7, WP8, and Windows8 are all tagged 3.1.0-rc1
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > re: Changelog
> >>>> > > It is a little more difficult in these cases, and I n'er
> >>>> volunteered to
> >>>> > do
> >>>> > > it, so whatevs
> >>>> > > - WP7+8 live in one repo, so their changes would need to be
> demuxed
> >>>> > > - all the changes for Windows8 have happened in the plugin
repos,
> >>>> and
> >>>> > > cordova-js, so changelog  would be empty
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Maybe I'll get this together for the 3.1.0, we'll see.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > @purplecabbage
> >>>> > > risingj.com<http://risingj.com>
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Andrew Grieve <
> >>>> agrieve@chromium.org<mailto:agrieve@chromium.org>
> >>>> > > >wrote:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > > For the last plugin release, I tagged them with the plugin's
> >>>> version.
> >>>> > > > (e.g. r0.2.1 for cordova-plugin-file). Only plugins that
had
> >>>> changes
> >>>> > were
> >>>> > > > included in the release, so some may still not have any
release
> >>>> tags.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Braden Shepherdson <
> >>>> > braden@chromium.org<mailto:braden@chromium.org>
> >>>> > > > >wrote:
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > > My understanding is that the plugins are totally
independent
> of
> >>>> > Cordova
> >>>> > > > > versions, and release on their own weekly-at-the-most-frequent
> >>>> cycle.
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > They only depend on Cordova versions when they need
a
> >>>> sufficiently
> >>>> > new
> >>>> > > > > platform to support some feature (binary bridge,
for example),
> >>>> and
> >>>> > then
> >>>> > > > > they set <engine> tags appropriately.
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > Braden
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Marcel Kinard <
> >>>> cmarcelk@gmail.com<mailto:cmarcelk@gmail.com>>
> >>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > Will the plugin repos get tagged? If so, do
they get tagged
> on
> >>>> > every
> >>>> > > > > > weekly cycle, or only when a cadence lines
up with a weekly
> >>>> cycle,
> >>>> > or
> >>>> > > > > both?
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > I see that StepsForPluginRelease wiki say it
will happen,
> and
> >>>> the
> >>>> > > most
> >>>> > > > > > recent coho looks like it will do it, but I
currently see
> >>>> only tags
> >>>> > > for
> >>>> > > > > > 3.0.0 and 3.0.0rc1 in the plugins repos, not
a "weekly" tag.
> >>>> > Thanks!
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > On Sep 9, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Andrew Grieve
<
> >>>> agrieve@chromium.org<mailto:agrieve@chromium.org>>
> >>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > I think it's time to get the ball rolling
on this. It'll
> be
> >>>> the
> >>>> > > first
> >>>> > > > > > > release post-3.0, so will likely have
a few bumps to work
> >>>> > through.
> >>>> > > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > How about:
> >>>> > > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > Friday 13th - Create release branches
& tag RC of all
> repos
> >>>> > > > > > > Monday 16th - Draft Release Blog Post
(digest of
> changelogs)
> >>>> > > > > > > Thurs 19th - Tag 3.1.0 for all repos
> >>>> > > > > > > Fri 20th - Push 3.1.0-1.0.0 of CLI to
npm & Post blog post
> >>>> > > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > The main feature of this release will
be plugman-registry
> I
> >>>> > think.
> >>>> > > > That
> >>>> > > > > > > said, since CLI / Plugman aren't tied
to cadence
> releases, I
> >>>> > think
> >>>> > > > it's
> >>>> > > > > > > just cordova-docs that is relevant.
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged
material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges),
or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination,
distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized
and may be unlawful.


Mime
View raw message