cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Plugins Release blog post
Date Fri, 27 Sep 2013 01:08:28 GMT
Looks like I forgot to click publish on the review page. I also found a
bunch of spelling mistakes I made in my rush to create this. I just fixed
them and uploaded a new diff. The review site should be available for all
now to leave feedback.


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com> wrote:

> Today we are doing a big plugin release in preperation for Apache Cordova
> 3.1.0 which is scheduled to come out next week.
>
> The main change for this release is removing core from all of the plugin
> ID fields. This was done to make installing plugins easier in 3.1.0. We are
> switching over to using plugin IDs and ourplugin registery<http://plugins.cordova.io/>
for
> plugin installation instead of directly installing from the plugin git urls.
>
> These plugins are compatitable with Cordova 3.0.0. Feel free to upgrade
> your current plugins if you can’t wait for 3.1.0 next week. Keep in mind
> that after you install these update plugins, if you decide to remove these
> plugins from your project, you will have to reference the new IDs instead
> of the old ones that our docs show. Ex: ‘cordova rm
> org.apache.cordova.camera’ instead of ‘org.apache.cordova.core.camera’.
>
> *Other Notable Changes:*
>
>    - Firefox OS support for Vibration and Device Plugin
>    - Windows 8 support for multiple plugins
>    - Fixed warnings that arose with XCode 5
>    - CB-4847 iOS 7 microphone access requires user permission (media
>    plugin)
>    - CB-4799 Fix incorrect JS references within native code for iOS &
>    Andrid (media plugin)
>    - CB-4806 Update splashscreen image bounds for iOS 7 (splashscreen
>    plugin)
>    - CB-4593 Added vibration support for BB10 (vibration plugin)
>
> You can check out the individual release notes in each of the plugin repos
> for more details.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I have no idea how this review stuff works. I will post the blog here
>> On Sep 26, 2013 4:59 PM, "Tim Kim" <timkim85@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> > "You don't have access to this review request.
>>> > This review request is private. You must be a requested reviewer,
>>> either
>>> > directly or on a requested group, and have permission to access the
>>> > repository in order to view this review request."
>>>
>>> Ya, same here
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 September 2013 16:37, Shazron <shazron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Does everyone have access to this? I get:
>>> >
>>> > "You don't have access to this review request.
>>> > This review request is private. You must be a requested reviewer,
>>> either
>>> > directly or on a requested group, and have permission to access the
>>> > repository in order to view this review request."
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Steven Gill <stevengill97@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Can you guys review it at https://reviews.apache.org/r/14356/
>>> > >
>>> > > I don't think post-review was working properly for me...
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Timothy Kim
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message