cordova-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian LeRoux...@brian.io>
Subject RE: 2.9.0 Support
Date Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:22:16 GMT
You can help!
On Sep 27, 2013 2:37 AM, "Smith, Peter" <peters@fast.au.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Back when we adopted 2.9.0 we were a bit apprehensive about early
> adoption of 3.x, so were quite encouraged to read:
>
> "We understand and respect that there is a huge community of projects
> built on PhoneGap 2.0 series and we will continue to support 2.x in a
> long lived branch."
> http://phonegap.com/blog/2013/06/20/coming-soon-phonegap30/
>
> At the time it seemed quite clear there would be a 2.9.1, but now it is
> not clear at all...
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmocny@google.com [mailto:mmocny@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> Mocny
> Sent: Friday, 27 September 2013 5:24 AM
> To: dev; bowserj@apache.org
> Subject: Re: 2.9.0 Support
>
> Sounds less than ideal to have to backport, given that we still support
> the old workflow with 3.0.
>
> However, I think we did discuss keeping 2.9 maintained while we iron out
> 3.0 issues.  I think we should drop 2.9 as soon as users run out of
> *valid* reasons for not upgrading to 3.0, right?
>
> What do users say when you suggest moving to 3.x to get the bugfix?
>
> -Michal
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Joe Bowser <bowserj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey
> >
> > What did we agree to for supporting the old 2.9.x branch? I'm just
> > wondering, since we're still getting tons of bugs filed against that.
> > While most of them are valid in 3.0.x, we probably should be
> > backporting to 2.9.
> >
> > Have people been doing this.  I've been doing this a bit, but I have
> > to admit that I've been slipping up recently.  What are people's
> > thoughts on this?
> >
> > Joe
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message