Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D15B110401 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24082 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 18:51:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cordova-dev-archive@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 24059 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 18:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cordova.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cordova.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cordova.apache.org Received: (qmail 24051 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2013 18:51:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:51:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cmarcelk@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.41] (HELO mail-oa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.219.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:51:53 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n10so6865382oag.14 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:51:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=aIVt1Ib6NAG1XTprsZcRwnSQf31Cb+DrwMn+KMin7nk=; b=buS0ur1fI7mKMKZ7UYLy568VpRP+hY3iHnlViVUxktQxjYlt8nheMPeCkCO43pwJhO Y8/5nNqoDHht6EiPF54MgGaB5YtXMrFCWAxUfVfA145KhwVWyLQC2A/GQyZW6RJwTvZ8 D+ftpBT26fdpkvX01XqdG65L8H22oIVOlKq3lEME5htS8xGt3UNA/i+/t9vywo1I3n9J KOX0n3RLJftk5t58AuSHQkvY6dkerUvU7vhbqpsNRYtaRlylq9jzsk7sy3NDeKJpkSh3 QKioCL4BjhuQZanGeNR55ao+H+U/B3CQV2aF8Mzt5B6XpjCOjKfS7zz0vQeoKrS4f7/c 7k5g== X-Received: by 10.60.134.239 with SMTP id pn15mr21120897oeb.99.1373309493006; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marcelk-macbook.raleigh.ibm.com ([129.33.49.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m11sm34580570oer.4.2013.07.08.11.51.32 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: restructuring guide content in doc From: Marcel Kinard In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 14:51:30 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <35C02676BF7FD84F92417E42E09DD8DCBCF41B5752@nambx08.corp.adobe.com> To: dev@cordova.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I really like Shaz's idea. But a couple questions: 1) Is it out-of-scope of Mike's task? 2) Getting rid of the folders and using the branches would make it = difficult to do overhauls like this since all branches in cordova-docs = would need updates. So optimize out the duplication (one folder, many = branches) or optimize for overhauls (one branch, many folders)=85? = Aligning the docs to have the same branches as the code makes great = sense, but maintaining and overhauling could be painful unless there was = a script to allow editing and building of all the branches without = having to do a bunch of serial "git checkout targetTag" invocations. On Jul 5, 2013, at 12:55 PM, Shazron wrote: > The "versioning"/folder structure is still in place I reckon? >=20 > Here was my idea: > http://markmail.org/message/iebcuv2ztuna73az >=20 > Whole thread regarding this problem: > http://markmail.org/thread/6b5oylvfe6y3r64x